Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of flush mounted hot-film sensors for mean wall shear stress measurement in turbulent flows of dilute drag reducing polymer solution. A series of pipe flow expriments were conducted over a range of Reynolds numbers and polymer solution concentrations to compare the level of skin friction drag reduction measured by hot-film sensors with values calculated from pipe pressure drop. It is shown that water calibrated hot-film sensors consistently underestimate the wall shear stress suggesting that Reynolds analogy is not valid in dilute polymer solutions. The Newtonian form of the relationship between the wall shear stress and the heat transfer remains valid in dilute polymer solutions. However, multiplicative and additive factors in the relationship are shown to increase linearly with the logarithm of the polymer concentration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berman, N. S. 1978: Drag reduction by polymers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 10, 47–64
Cho, Y. I.; Hartnett, J. P. 1982: Non-Newtonian fluids in circular pipe flow. Advances in Heat Transfer, 15, 59–141
Goforth, M. B.; McLaughlin, D. K.; Gran, R. L. 1987: Calibration of surface hot-film sensors in dilute polymer flows. Dynamic Technology Inc., 21311 Hawthorne Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503, Report DT-8451–02
Harbison, W. L. 1990: The use of flush mounted hot-film sensors in viscoelastic drag reduction polymer solutions for the measurement of mean wall shear stress. M.S. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University
Kalashnikov, V. N.; Kudin, A. M. 1973: Calibration of hot-film probes in water and in polymer solutions. DISA Information, 14, 15–18
Liepmann, H. W.; Skinner, G. T. 1954: Shearing stress measurements by use of a heated element. NACA Report TN 3268
Ludwieg, H. 1950: Instrument for measuring the wall shearing stress of turbulent boundary layers. NACA Report TM 1284
Sellin, R. H. J.; Hoyt, J. W.; Pollert, J.; Scrivener, O. 1982: The effect of drag reducing additives on fluid flows and their industrial applications. Part 2: Applications and Future Proposals. J. Hydraulic Res., 20(3), 235–292
Tung, T. T; Ng, K. S.; Hartnett, J. P. 1978: Pipe friction factors for concentrated aqueous solutions of polyacrylamide. Lett. Heat Mass Transfer, 5, 59–66
Virk, P. S.; Mickley, H. S.; Smith, K. A. 1970: The ultimate asymptote and mean flow structure in Toms' phenomenon. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 37, 488–493
White, A.; Hemmings, J. A. C. 1976: Drag reduction by additives: review and bibliography. Cranfield [Eng.], BHRA Fluid Engineering
White, F. M. 1979: Fluid mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill
Yoo, S. S. 1974: Heat transfer and friction factor for Non-Newtonian fluids in turbulent pipe flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harbison, W.L., Petrie, H.L. Evaluation of flush mounted hot-film sensors for skin friction reduction measurements in viscoelastic polymer solutions. Experiments in Fluids 11, 243–246 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192750
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192750