Skip to main content
Log in

The healthy volunteer in clinical pharmacology: personality and motivation

  • Clinical Trials
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to quantify the personality structure and motivation of medical students, who are often the most readily available source of healthy volunteers, since it has long been known that the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of drugs can be substantially modified by predominant personality traits (e.g. neuroticism, extraversion). Over the course of 4 years, a total of 337 subjects (165 males, 172 females) out of the 496 medical students asked, participated in the study after appropriate instruction. Students were tested using the Motivation Q-Sort method which, by means of questions (“questionnaire sort”), investigates whether a subject tends to react in a success-motivated (SM) or a failure-motivated (FM) mode. The variable measured is the so-called net hope (NH), where NH >1.6 corresponds to SM and NH <-0.3 corresponds to FM. We also used the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI) as a suitable method of determining personality structure. The predominant traits of interest found were nervousness (FPI 1), extraversion (FPI E), and neuroticism (FPI N). In the first series of tests (primary selection), motivation only was determined in 337 volunteers. The range was fairly broad, with NH values from 4.32 (highly SM) to -3.09 (highly FM). In the second series of tests, about 60 SM and 60 FM subjects were selected. The Motivation Q-Sort method was repeated with students placed under more difficult conditions, and the FPI was also performed. This procedure showed that (1) the NH values were comparatively stable under varied conditions and (2) in part marked correlations existed between motivation and personality: SM subjects tended to be extravert, emotionally stable and not nervous, whereas FM volunteers tended to be introvert, emotionally unstable and nervous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amori G, Lenox RH (1989) Do volunteer subjects bias clinical trials? J Clin Psychopharmacol 9:321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Amthauer R (1953) Intelligenz-Struktur-Test. Handanweisung. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JW (1958) Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Van Nostrand, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball CJ, McLaren PM, Morrison PJ (1993) The personality structure of ‘normal’ volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 36: 369–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann H (1974) Training der Leistungsbereitschaft. Thesis, Department of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth W (1979) Persönlichkeitseigenschaften von Epileptikern. Neurol Psychiat 5:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann S (1986) Zum Einflu§ von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften auf den Verlauf ereignisbezogener Potentiale. Unpublished Dissertation, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Düker H (1959) Der Konzentrations-Leistungs-Test. Handanweisung. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel RR, Engel-Sittenfeld P (1980) Schlafverhalten, Persönlichkeit und Schlafmittelgebrauch von Patienten mit chronischen Schlafstörungen. Nervenarzt 51:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck HJ (1981) Personality and psychosomatic diseases. Acta Nerv [Suppl] 23:112–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrenberg J, Selg H (1970) Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar (FPI). Handanweisung. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen H (1989) Motivation und Handeln. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1994) Trials in women. Lancet 343:745–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston BK (1989) Personality dimensions in reactivity and cardiovascular disease. In: Schneiderman N, Weiss SM, Kaufmann PG (eds) Handbook of research methods in cardiovascular behavioural medicine. Plenum Press, New York, pp 495–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke W (1964) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Wirkung psychotroper Substanzen von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen. Ein Beitrag zur Begründung einer differentiellen Pharmakopsychologie. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke W, Debus G (1975) Pharmakopsychologische Untersuchungen an gesunden Probanden zur Prognose der therapeutischen Effizienz von Psychopharmaka. Arzneimittelforschung 25:1185–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke W, Debus G, Longo N (1979) Differential psychopharmacology of tranquilizing and sedating drugs. Mod Prob Pharmacopsychiatry 14:13–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnoila M, Liljequist R, Olkoniema J, Saario I (1977) Effect of alcohol and benzodiazepines on performance as related to personality characteristics. Personality characteristics among healthy “placebo reactors” and nonreactors. Pharmacopsychiatry 10:246–253

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann CC, Goldfarb B, Frisk M, Quera-Salva MA, Meyer P (1992) The role of personality factors and suggestion in placebo effect during mental stress test. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FP (1992) Aspekte einer differentiellen Humanpsychopharmakologie. In: Oldigs-Kerber J, Leonard JP (eds) Pharmakopsychologie. Experimentelle und klinische Aspekte. Fischer, Jena, pp 187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FP (1994) Influence of nifedipine on human performance following a single dose — differential psychopharmacological aspects. Hum Psychopharmacol 9:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FP, Andresen K (1993) Stabilization of psychophysical performance of healthy volunteers by propranolol — a contribution to differential psychopharmacology. Hum Psychopharmacology 8:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FP, Walther H (1983) Untersuchungen zur Gültigkeit des Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventars im Rahmen psychopharmakologischer Analysen. Z Gesamte Hygiene 29:141–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FP, Walther H, Köhler E (1982) Zum Einfluß des Persönlichkeitsmerkmals “emotionale Labilität” auf die gastrointestinale Resorption von Coffein. Zentralbl Pharm Pharmakother Labordiagn 121:871–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FP, Walther T, Walther H (1983) Über den Einfluß von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen auf die Reaktionsleistungen freiwilliger Probanden nach einmaliger Applikation von Plazebo, Crotylbarbital und Coffein. Pharmacopsychiatry 16:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltz KH (1992) Der symptomatische Proband. In: Lange L, Jaeger H, Seifert W, Klingmann I (eds) Good clinical practice I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano S, Ogawa N, Kawazu Y (1980) Influence of neuroticism on oral absorption of diazepam. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27:370–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldigs-Kerber J, Sittig W (1992) Probandenmodelle der Phase I am Beispiel der ZNS-Forschung: Entwicklung und Standort bei der Untersuchung von Arzneimitteln. In: Oldigs-Kerber J, Leonard JP (eds) Pharmakopsychologie. Experimentelle und klinische Aspekte. Fischer, Jena, pp 166–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters MSM, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Schoemaker HC, Cohen AF (1992) Self-selection for personality variables among healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle W, Humphreys MS, Simon L, Grilliland K (1980) The interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: a test of the arousal model. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbe J (1975) Erfassung der Leistungsbereitschaft. Thesis, Department of Psychology Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman RH, Chesney MA (1982) Psychologische Profile und koronare Herzkrankheit. In: Kielstein P, Siegenthaler W, Taggart P, Zanchett A (eds) Psychosomatische Herz-Kreislauf-Störungen: wann und wie behandeln. Huber, Bern, pp 36–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1975) The volunteer subject. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühle R (1988) Zur Bedeutung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen im Rahmen der verkehrspsychologischen Tauglichkeitsbewertung. Verkehrsmedizin 35:105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1988), SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber K (1977) Psychopharmaka: Modellversuch an gesunden Versuchspersonen zur Vorhersage therapeutischer Effekte und Dosen. Arzneimittelforschung 27:319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchtländer M, Meyer FP (1985) Der Einfluß von Diazepam (Faustan) auf die Reaktionsfähigkeit und die subjektive Befindlichkeit gesunder Probanden — ein Beitrag zur differentiellen Psychopharmakologie. Z klin Med 40:673–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram H, Moltz A (1974) Zur Brauchbarkeit des Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventars (FPI) für die Neurosendiagnostik. In: Helm J, Kasielke E, Mehl J (eds) Neurosendiagnostik. Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, pp 75–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, F.P., Röhl, FW. & Haschke, R. The healthy volunteer in clinical pharmacology: personality and motivation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 48, 91–96 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192731

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192731

Key words

Navigation