Abstract
The aim of the present study was to quantify the personality structure and motivation of medical students, who are often the most readily available source of healthy volunteers, since it has long been known that the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of drugs can be substantially modified by predominant personality traits (e.g. neuroticism, extraversion). Over the course of 4 years, a total of 337 subjects (165 males, 172 females) out of the 496 medical students asked, participated in the study after appropriate instruction. Students were tested using the Motivation Q-Sort method which, by means of questions (“questionnaire sort”), investigates whether a subject tends to react in a success-motivated (SM) or a failure-motivated (FM) mode. The variable measured is the so-called net hope (NH), where NH >1.6 corresponds to SM and NH <-0.3 corresponds to FM. We also used the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI) as a suitable method of determining personality structure. The predominant traits of interest found were nervousness (FPI 1), extraversion (FPI E), and neuroticism (FPI N). In the first series of tests (primary selection), motivation only was determined in 337 volunteers. The range was fairly broad, with NH values from 4.32 (highly SM) to -3.09 (highly FM). In the second series of tests, about 60 SM and 60 FM subjects were selected. The Motivation Q-Sort method was repeated with students placed under more difficult conditions, and the FPI was also performed. This procedure showed that (1) the NH values were comparatively stable under varied conditions and (2) in part marked correlations existed between motivation and personality: SM subjects tended to be extravert, emotionally stable and not nervous, whereas FM volunteers tended to be introvert, emotionally unstable and nervous.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amori G, Lenox RH (1989) Do volunteer subjects bias clinical trials? J Clin Psychopharmacol 9:321–327
Amthauer R (1953) Intelligenz-Struktur-Test. Handanweisung. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Atkinson JW (1958) Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Van Nostrand, Princeton
Ball CJ, McLaren PM, Morrison PJ (1993) The personality structure of ‘normal’ volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 36: 369–371
Bergmann H (1974) Training der Leistungsbereitschaft. Thesis, Department of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
Demuth W (1979) Persönlichkeitseigenschaften von Epileptikern. Neurol Psychiat 5:271–274
Dormann S (1986) Zum Einflu§ von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften auf den Verlauf ereignisbezogener Potentiale. Unpublished Dissertation, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
Düker H (1959) Der Konzentrations-Leistungs-Test. Handanweisung. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Engel RR, Engel-Sittenfeld P (1980) Schlafverhalten, Persönlichkeit und Schlafmittelgebrauch von Patienten mit chronischen Schlafstörungen. Nervenarzt 51:22–29
Eysenck HJ (1981) Personality and psychosomatic diseases. Acta Nerv [Suppl] 23:112–129
Fahrenberg J, Selg H (1970) Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar (FPI). Handanweisung. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Heckhausen H (1989) Motivation und Handeln. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Horton R (1994) Trials in women. Lancet 343:745–746
Houston BK (1989) Personality dimensions in reactivity and cardiovascular disease. In: Schneiderman N, Weiss SM, Kaufmann PG (eds) Handbook of research methods in cardiovascular behavioural medicine. Plenum Press, New York, pp 495–509
Janke W (1964) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Wirkung psychotroper Substanzen von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen. Ein Beitrag zur Begründung einer differentiellen Pharmakopsychologie. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt
Janke W, Debus G (1975) Pharmakopsychologische Untersuchungen an gesunden Probanden zur Prognose der therapeutischen Effizienz von Psychopharmaka. Arzneimittelforschung 25:1185–1194
Janke W, Debus G, Longo N (1979) Differential psychopharmacology of tranquilizing and sedating drugs. Mod Prob Pharmacopsychiatry 14:13–98
Linnoila M, Liljequist R, Olkoniema J, Saario I (1977) Effect of alcohol and benzodiazepines on performance as related to personality characteristics. Personality characteristics among healthy “placebo reactors” and nonreactors. Pharmacopsychiatry 10:246–253
McCann CC, Goldfarb B, Frisk M, Quera-Salva MA, Meyer P (1992) The role of personality factors and suggestion in placebo effect during mental stress test. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:107–110
Meyer FP (1992) Aspekte einer differentiellen Humanpsychopharmakologie. In: Oldigs-Kerber J, Leonard JP (eds) Pharmakopsychologie. Experimentelle und klinische Aspekte. Fischer, Jena, pp 187–200
Meyer FP (1994) Influence of nifedipine on human performance following a single dose — differential psychopharmacological aspects. Hum Psychopharmacol 9:93–100
Meyer FP, Andresen K (1993) Stabilization of psychophysical performance of healthy volunteers by propranolol — a contribution to differential psychopharmacology. Hum Psychopharmacology 8:185–194
Meyer FP, Walther H (1983) Untersuchungen zur Gültigkeit des Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventars im Rahmen psychopharmakologischer Analysen. Z Gesamte Hygiene 29:141–143
Meyer FP, Walther H, Köhler E (1982) Zum Einfluß des Persönlichkeitsmerkmals “emotionale Labilität” auf die gastrointestinale Resorption von Coffein. Zentralbl Pharm Pharmakother Labordiagn 121:871–876
Meyer FP, Walther T, Walther H (1983) Über den Einfluß von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen auf die Reaktionsleistungen freiwilliger Probanden nach einmaliger Applikation von Plazebo, Crotylbarbital und Coffein. Pharmacopsychiatry 16:13–18
Moltz KH (1992) Der symptomatische Proband. In: Lange L, Jaeger H, Seifert W, Klingmann I (eds) Good clinical practice I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–213
Nakano S, Ogawa N, Kawazu Y (1980) Influence of neuroticism on oral absorption of diazepam. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27:370–374
Oldigs-Kerber J, Sittig W (1992) Probandenmodelle der Phase I am Beispiel der ZNS-Forschung: Entwicklung und Standort bei der Untersuchung von Arzneimitteln. In: Oldigs-Kerber J, Leonard JP (eds) Pharmakopsychologie. Experimentelle und klinische Aspekte. Fischer, Jena, pp 166–175
Pieters MSM, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Schoemaker HC, Cohen AF (1992) Self-selection for personality variables among healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:101–106
Revelle W, Humphreys MS, Simon L, Grilliland K (1980) The interactive effect of personality, time of day, and caffeine: a test of the arousal model. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:1–31
Ribbe J (1975) Erfassung der Leistungsbereitschaft. Thesis, Department of Psychology Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
Rosenman RH, Chesney MA (1982) Psychologische Profile und koronare Herzkrankheit. In: Kielstein P, Siegenthaler W, Taggart P, Zanchett A (eds) Psychosomatische Herz-Kreislauf-Störungen: wann und wie behandeln. Huber, Bern, pp 36–59
Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1975) The volunteer subject. Wiley, New York
Rühle R (1988) Zur Bedeutung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen im Rahmen der verkehrspsychologischen Tauglichkeitsbewertung. Verkehrsmedizin 35:105–123
SAS Institute (1988), SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
Taeuber K (1977) Psychopharmaka: Modellversuch an gesunden Versuchspersonen zur Vorhersage therapeutischer Effekte und Dosen. Arzneimittelforschung 27:319–324
Uchtländer M, Meyer FP (1985) Der Einfluß von Diazepam (Faustan−) auf die Reaktionsfähigkeit und die subjektive Befindlichkeit gesunder Probanden — ein Beitrag zur differentiellen Psychopharmakologie. Z klin Med 40:673–676
Wolfram H, Moltz A (1974) Zur Brauchbarkeit des Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventars (FPI) für die Neurosendiagnostik. In: Helm J, Kasielke E, Mehl J (eds) Neurosendiagnostik. Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, pp 75–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, F.P., Röhl, FW. & Haschke, R. The healthy volunteer in clinical pharmacology: personality and motivation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 48, 91–96 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192731
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192731