Skip to main content
Log in

Antihypertensive efficacy of twice daily controlled release diltiazem using 24 hour intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy of a new controlled release formulation of diltiazem administered in a twice-daily dose in patients with essential hypertension using 24 hour intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Sixteen patients (2 female) of mean age 53 years with mild to moderate essential hypertension, defined as a supine resting diastolic cuff blood pressure ≥95 mm Hg, were recruited to a sequential dose ranging study of controlled release (CR) diltiazem. After a six week run-in period without any anti-hypertensive medication, intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring with 60° tilt, isometric handgrip and bicycle exercise testing were performed. Patients were then treated for one week with CR diltiazem 120 mg b.i.d. If supine resting diastolic cuff blood pressure fell by <10 mm Hg compared to the last run-in value and remained >90 mm Hg, the dose was increased to 240 mg b.i.d. for a week, and if necessary to 360 mg b.i.d. for a week. Patients continued for further one month on the dose of CR diltiazem at which they achieved target blood pressure reduction. At the end of this maintenance treatment, 24 hour intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring was repeated.

Twelve patients were satisfactorily controlled on 120 mg b.i.d. CR diltiazem, three on 240 mg twice daily and one on 360 mg twice daily. During rest and exercise, blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower after treatment with CR diltiazem than before treatment. The hypotensive effect of diltiazem was maintained throughout the 12 hour dosing interval and the early morning blood pressure response was blunted. No adverse effects or ECG abnormalities were reported.

It was concluded that CR diltiazem 120 mg, administered twice daily to a total daily dose of between 240 mg and 720 mg, is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh BN, Ellrodt G, Nademanee K (1984) Calcium antagonists: cardiocirculatory effects and therapeutic applications. In: Hurst JW (ed) Clinical essays on the heart, vol 2. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 65–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Posma JL, Van Dijk RB, Lie KI (1989) Sustained-release diltiazem versus metoprolol in stable angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 10: 923–927

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wheatley D (1985) A comparison of diltiazem and atenolol in angina. Postgrad Med J 785–789

  4. Weiner DA, Cutler SS, Klein MD (1986) Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 57: 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klinke WP, Kvill, Dempsey EE, Grace M (1988) A randomised double-blind comparison of diltiazem and nifedipine in stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 12: 1562–1567

    Google Scholar 

  6. Subramanian VB (1982) Calcium channel blockers in chronic stable angina. Herz 7: 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg D, Pappas JE, Rofman BA, et al (1988) Once-daily dosing of sustained release diltiazem capsules in mild-to-moderate hypertension. JAMA 88: 1489–1492

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weir MR, Josselson J, Giard MJ, et al (1987) Sustained-release diltiazem compared with atenolol monotherapy for mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 60: 361–411

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nikkila MT, Inkovaara JA, Heikkinen JT, Olsson SOR (1989) Antihypertensive effect of diltiazem in a slow-release formulation for mild to moderate essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 63: 1227–1230

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pool PE, Herron JM, Rosenblatt S, et al (1989) Sustained-release diltiazem: duration of antihypertensive effect. J Clin Pharmacol 29: 533–537

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greenburg RN (1984) Overview of patient compliance with medication dosing: a literature review. Clin Ther Res 6: 592–599

    Google Scholar 

  12. Littler WA, Komsuoglu B (1989) Which is most accurate method of measuring blood pressure? Am Heart J 117: 723–728

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gould BA, Mann S, Davies AB, Altman DG, Raftery EB (1981) Does placebo lower blood pressure? Lancet II: 1377–1381

    Google Scholar 

  14. Millar Craig MW, Hawes, Whittington J (1978) New system for recording ambulatory blood pressure in man. Med Biol Eng Comput 16: 727–731

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilcox J (1982) Observer factor in the measurement of blood pressure. JAMA

  16. Raftery EB (1974) Problems of measuring blood pressure in clinical trials. In: Hypertension its nature and treatment. CIBA Laboratories, Horsham, England, pp 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grimley-Evans J (1970) Experience with the random zero sphygmomanometer. Br J Prev Soc Med 24: 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  18. Labarthe DR, Hawkins CM, Remington RD (1973) Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure. Am J Cardiol 32: 546–553

    Google Scholar 

  19. Casadei R, Parati G, Pomidossi G, Groppellic A, Tazzi S, Mancia G (1988) 24 hour blood pressure monitoring: evaluation of spacelabs 5300 monitor by comparison with intra-arterial blood pressure in ambulant subjects. J Hypertension 6: 797–803

    Google Scholar 

  20. Berhand G, BeFaire U, Castenfarc J, Anderson G, Hartford M, Liedholm H, Ljinngmann D (1985) Monitoring 24 hour blood pressure in a drug trial. Evaluation of a non-invasive device. Hypertension 7: 688–694

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sokolow M, Werdegar D, Klain J, Hinman A (1966) Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension. Circulation 34: 279–298

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mann S, Millar-Craig M, Raftery EB (1985) Superiority of 24 hours measurement of blood pressure over clinic values in determining prognosis in hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertension 7: 279–281

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mann S, Millar-Craig M, Balosubramanian V, Raftery EB (1981) Once daily β-adrenergic blockade in hypertension: an ambulatory assessment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 12: 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones RI, Hornung RS, Cashman PMM, Raftery EB (1985) Effect of enalapril at rest, during tilt, static and dynamic exercise in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 55: 1534–1538

    Google Scholar 

  25. O'Brien E, O'Malley K, Cox J, Stauton A (1991) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of drug efficacy. Am Heart J 121: 999–1006

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sridhara, B.S., Thomas, P., Lahiri, A. et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of twice daily controlled release diltiazem using 24 hour intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 46, 427–430 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191905

Key words

Navigation