Skip to main content
Log in

Spinal abnormalities and the atypical form of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 96 patients with congenital absence of the uterus and upper vagina, the Mayer-Rokitansky-KüsterHauser (MRKH) syndrome, it proved possible to distinguish between the typical and the atypical form using laparoscopy. The typical form was characterized by symmetrical nonfunctioning muscular buds (the Müllerian duct remnants) and normal fallopian tubes, and the atypical form by aplasia of one or both buds, one bud smaller than the contralateral one, with or without dysplasia of one or both fallopian tubes. The atypical form was found in 52 patients (54.2%). Radiographs of the spine showed that congenital spinal abnormalities, especially the Klippel-Feil (KF) syndrome, were seen in 14 of the 52 patients with the atypical form only. Renal agenesis or ectopia together with the MRKH and KF syndromes, known as the MURCS association (MU: Müllerian duct aplasia; R: renal agenesis/ectopia; CS: cervical somite dysplasia), was diagnosed in 10/52 patients in the atypical group. From our results we conclude that additional cervical spine films in patients with the MRKH syndrome are indicated only in the atypical form the syndrome. In those cases where the MRKH syndrome is associated with the KF syndrome, the MURCS association should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baird P, Lowry R (1974) Absent vagina and the Klippel-Feil anomaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 118:290–291

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barach B, Falces E, Benzian S (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and preoperative planning in agenesis of the distal vagina. Ann Plast Surg 19:192–194

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chawla S, Bery K, Indra K (1966) Abnormalities of the urinary tract and skeleton, associated with congenital absence of the vagina. Br Med J 1:1398–1400

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chervenak F, Stangel J, Nemec M, Amin H (1982) MayerRokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. NY State J Med 82:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Da Silva E (1982) Autosomal recessive Klippel-Feil syndrome. J Med Genet 219:130–134

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duncan P (1977) Embryologic pathogenesis of renal agenesiassociated with cervical vertebral anomalies (Klippel-Feil phenotype). Birth Defects 13:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duncan P, Shapiro L, Stangel J, Klein R, Addonizio J (1979) The MURCS-association: Muellerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia. J Pediatr 95:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D et al. (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 76:593–596

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghirardini G, Segre A (1982) Vaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome): recent etiopathogenetical and anatomical views. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 9:98–102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gorlin R, Pindborg J, Cohen M (1976) Syndromes of the head and neck. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray S, Romain C, Skandalakis J (1964) Congenital fusion of cervical vertebrae. Surg Gynecol Obstet 118:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin J, Edwards C, Madden J, Harrod M, Wilson J (1976) Congenital absence of the vagina, the Mayer-RokitanskyKüster-Hauser syndrome. Ann Int Med 85:224–236

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gunderson C, Greenspan R, Glaser G, Lubs H (1967) The Klippel-Feil syndrome: genetic and clinical reevaluation of cervical fusion. Medecin 46:491–512

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heidenreich W (1988) Genitale und extragenitale Fehlbildungen beim Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrom. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 113:1092–1096

    Google Scholar 

  15. Muechler E (1975) Muellerian duct agenesis associated with renal and skeletal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121:567–568

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy A, Krall A, Rock J (1987) Bilateral functioning uterine anlagen with the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Int J Fertil 32:316–319

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nussbaum Blask A, Sanders R, Rock J (1991) Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography. II. Teenagers. Radiology 179:84–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Park I, Jones H (1971) A new syndrome in two unrelated females: Klippel-Feil deformity, conuctive deafness and absent vagina. Birth Defects 10:311–317

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ramsey J, Bliznak J (1971) Klippel-Feil syndrome with renal agenesis and other anomalies. Am J Roentgenol 113:460–463

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg HK, Sherman NH, Tarry WT, et al. (1986) Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: US aid to diagnosis. Radiology 161:815–819

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid-Tannwald I, Hauser G (1977) Deutung der “atypischen” Formen des Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 37:386–392

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schmid-Tannwald I, Hauser G (1980) Das Mayer-RokitanskyKüster-Hauser Syndrom. Gynakol Prax 4:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shoul M, Ritvo M (1952) Clinical and roentgenologic manifestations of the Klippel-Feil syndrome (congenital fusion of the cervical vertebrae, brevicollis). Am J Roentgenol 68:269–285

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silverman F (1985) Caffey's pediatric X-ray diagnosis, 8th edn. Year Book Medical, Chaicago, p 298

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stark E, Borton T (1972) Hearing loss and the Klippel-Feil syndrome. Am J Dis Child 123:233–235

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strübbe E, Thijn C, Willemsen W, Lappoehn R (1987) Evaluation of radiographic abnormalities of the hand in patients with the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 16:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strübbe EH, Willemsen WNP, Lemmens JAM, Thijn CJP, Rolland R (1992) Urinary tract anomalies and the atypical form of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, (in press)

  28. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Nakamo Y et al. (1987) Vaginal agenesis: classification by MR imaging. Radiology 162:675–677

    Google Scholar 

  29. Turunen A, Unerus C (1967) Spinal changes in patients with congenital aplasia of the vagina. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 46:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  30. Willemsen W (1982) Neovagina-plastiek met peritoneum-transpositie. Thesis, Nijmegen

  31. Willemsen W (1982) Combination of the Mayer-RokitanskyKüster-Hauser and Klippel-Feil syndrome. A case report and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 13:229–235

    Google Scholar 

  32. Willemsen W, Dony J (1988) Een decennium ervaring met de behandeling van hypoen aplasia van de vagina met de neovaginaplastiek volgens Davydov en met de (niet-operatieve) methode van Frank. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 132:1199–1202

    Google Scholar 

  33. Winer-Muram H, Muram D (1984) The concurrence of facioauriculovertebral spectrum and the Rokitansky syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 149:569–570

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strübbe, E.H., Lemmens, J.A.M., Thijn, C.J.P. et al. Spinal abnormalities and the atypical form of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 21, 459–462 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190992

Key words

Navigation