Skip to main content
Log in

Standardization and factor analysis: A clarification

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blalock H. (1967). “Path coefficients versus regression coefficients”, American Journal of Sociology 72: 675–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanadesikan R and Kettenring J.R. (1972). “Robust estimates, residuals and outlier detection with multiresponse data”, Biometrics 28: 81–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson D.N. and Chan D.W. (1980). “Maximum-likelihood estimation in common factor analysis: a cautionary note”, Psychological Bulletin 88: 502–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski W.J. (1979). “Between-groups comparison of principal components”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 703–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison D.F. (1976). Multivariate Statistical Methods. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel J.C., Woelfel J.D. and Woelfel M.L. (1980). “Standardized versus unstandardized data matrices: which type is more appropriate for factor analysis?”, Quality and Quantity 14: 699–710.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, S.C. Standardization and factor analysis: A clarification. Qual Quant 15, 445–446 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190411

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190411

Keywords

Navigation