Skip to main content
Log in

Insufflation

Complications and recommendations

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on complications in colonoscopy related to colonic insufflation. Causes of colonic insufflation complications are examined and methods that may be used to minimize complications are proposed. Testing of state-of-the-art video colonoscope systems is the basis of this analysis of insufflation complications and the resulting recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amidon PB, Story RK Jr (1993) Cecal volvulus after colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 39(1): 105

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avgerinos A, Kalantzis N, Rekoumis G, Pallikaris G, Arapakis G, Kanaghinis T (1984) Bowel preparation and the risk of explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gut 25: 361–364

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baillie J (1994) Complications of endoscopy. Endoscopy 26: 185–203

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bigard M-A, Gaucher P, Lassalle C (1979) Fatal colonic explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 77: 1307–1310

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt LJ, Boley SJ, Sammartano R (1986) Carbon dioxide and room air insufflation of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 32(5): 324–329

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burt V (1931) Pneumatic rupture of the intestinal canal. Arch Surg 22(6): 875–902

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chardavoyne R, Stein TA, Ratner LE, Bank S, Wise L (1991) Is colonoscopy safe in the early postcolectomy period? Am Surg 57: 734–736

    Google Scholar 

  8. ECRI (1994) Video colonoscope systems [Evaluation]. Health Devices 23(5): 151–195

    Google Scholar 

  9. FDA (1994) Medical device report (MDR). Accession No. 525231, July

  10. Hoffman JS, Cave NR, Birkett D (1994) Intra-operative enteroscopy with a intestinal fiberscope. Gastrointest Endosc 40(2): 229–230

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB (1984) Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 30(2): 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kozarek RA, Earnest DL, Silverstein ME, Smith RG (1980) Pressure-induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 78: 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leighton TA, Liu S-V, Bongard FS (1993) Comparative cardiopulmonary effects of carbon dioxide versus helium pneumoperitoneum. Surgery 113(5): 527–531

    Google Scholar 

  14. Livestone EM, Cohen GM, Troncale FJ (1974) Diastatic serosal lacerations: An unrecognized complication of colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 67(6): 1245–1247

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luchette FA, Doerr RJ, Kelly K, Kulaylat M, Stephan RM, Hassett JM (1992) Colonoscopic impaction in left colon strictures resulting in right colon pneumatic perforation. Surg Endosc 6: 273–276

    Google Scholar 

  16. Radin DR, Halls JM (1986) Cecal volvulus: a complication of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Radiol 11: 110–111

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers BH (1974) The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopic electrosurgical polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 20: 115–117

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steine S (1994) Which hurts the most? A comparison of pain rating during double contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy. Radiology 191(1): 99–101

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J, Norman G, Goodacre RL (1992) Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc 38(5): 564–567

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams CB, Lane RH, Sakai Y, Hanwell AE (1973) Colonoscopy: an air pressure hazard. Lancet 2: 729

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

ECRI was the location of the testing and research presented in this paper. ECRI, formerly known as Emergency Care Research Institute, is an independent and nonprofit health-care research organization that, among other functions, evaluates medical device technologies and provides guidance on their safe application

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picciano, L.D., Hansel, B.C. & Luchette, F.A. Insufflation. Surg Endosc 9, 834–837 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190095

Key words

Navigation