Summary
Water stress was imposed upon soybean [Glyxine max (L.) Merr. cv. Williams] and maize [Zea mays (L.) cv. Pioneer 3377] plants grown under controlled-environment conditions during a growing period of several irrigation cycles. Transpiration rates of individual plants were measured with a calibrated heat-pulse method and correlated to the rate of water loss obtained from successive weighings of the pots containing irrigated or water-stressed plants. Transpiration rate was reduced in the stressed plants of both species, but the reduction was not linear with decreasing soil matric potential. Transpiration rates declined rapidly at high soil matric potential, and dropped more slowly as the soil dried. Although measured transpiration rate declined by nearly 30% following a reduction of soil matric potential to -0.1 MPa, differences in leaf water potential and CO2 assimilation rate were small and less than the sensitivity of the measurement techniques used. Total system resistance to water flow increased as the soil dried.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerson RC, Krieg R, Horing CL, Chang N (1977) Effects of plant water status on stomatal activity, photosynthesis, and nitrate reductase activity of field grown cotton. Crop Sci 17:81
Blizzard WE, Boyer JS (1980) Comparative resistance of the soil and the plant to water transport. Plant Physiol 66:805
Cohen Y, Fuchs M, Falkenflug V, Moreshet S (1988) A calibrated heat pulse method for determining water uptake in cotton. Agron J 80:398
Cortes PM, Sinclair TR (1986) Gas exchange of field-grown soybean under drought. Agron J 78:454
Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117
Denmead OT, Shaw RH (1962) Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture content and meteorological conditions. Agron J 54:385
Fiscus EL, Markhart AH III. (1979) Relationships between root system water transport properties and plant size. Plant Physiol 64:770
Fuchs M, Cohen Y, Moreshet S (1987). Determining transpiration from meteorological data and crop characteristics for irrigation management. Irrig Sci 8:91
Hesketh JD, Woolley JT, Peters DB (1984) Leaf photosynthetic exchange rates in light and CO2 enriched environments. Photosynthetica 18:536
Jones JW, Zur B, Boote KJ, Hammond LC (1982) Plant resistance to water flow in field soybeans. I. Non-limiting soil moisture. Agron J 74:92
Passioura JB (1984) Hydraulic resistance of plants. II. Constant or variable? Aust J Plant Physiol 11:333
Patterson DT, Bunce JA, Alberte RS, van Valkenburgh E (1977) Photosynthesis in relation to leaf characteristics of cotton from controlled and field environments. Plant Physiol 59:384
Reicosky DC, Kasper TC, Taylor HM (1982) Diurnal relationship between evapotranspiration and leaf water potential of field-grown soybeans. Agron J 74:667
Ritchie JT (1973) Influence of soil water status and meteorological conditions on evaporation from a corn canopy. Agron J 65:893
Wit CT de (1958) Transpiration and crop yields. Publ. #64.6, Institute of Biological and Chemical Research on Field Crops and Herbage (C.A.B.O.), Wageningen
Zur B, Jones JW, Hammond LC (1982) Total resistance to water flow in field soybeans: II. Limiting soil moisture. Agron J 74:99
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, Y., Huck, M.G., Hesketh, J.D. et al. Sap flow in the stem of water stressed soybean and maize plants. Irrig Sci 11, 45–50 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189994
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189994