Skip to main content
Log in

The role of preoperative investigations in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies

Results in 200 consecutive cases

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: When we began laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) we set up a strict preoperative workup in order to assess whether currently available investigations could help predict difficult laparoscopic procedures.

Methods: Reported here are the results of a prospective trial carried out in our first 200 consecutive patients, who underwent routine intravenous cholangiography (IVC), abdominal ultrasound scan (US), blood tests—namely, markers of biliary stasis (MBS)—and preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in case of clinically suspected common bile duct stones (CBDS).

Results: On the basis of our experience we think that the US findings relate to the difficulty of the laparoscopic procedure more closely than the other preoperative investigations, and the association of US and liver chemistry provides an accurate evaluation of biliary stones.

Conclusions: In agreement with data emerging from the literature, the preoperative investigations do not seem to be useful in predicting biliary and vascular complications, whose prevention lies in the adoption of correct surgical technique and a low threshold for conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiet J, Becker H, Buess G, Trode M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crist DW, Gadacz TR (1993) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 74(2): 265–289

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and personal experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(1): 52–57

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evrard S, Dondelinger RF, Mutter D, Vix M, Mendoza-Burgos L, Marescaux J (1993) Graves complications après cholécystectomie par coelioscopie: leçons d'hier et d'aujourd'hui. J Chir (Paris) 130(5): 215–217

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fink AS (1993) To ERCP or not to ERCP? That is the question. [Editorial] Surg Endosc 7: 375–376

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ress AM, Sarr MG, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB, Donohue JH, Meilrath DC (1993) Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 655–662

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spaw AT, Eddie JR, Olsen DO (1991) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(1): 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zar (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp 395–396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urbano, D., Di Nardo, R., De Simone, P. et al. The role of preoperative investigations in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 10, 791–793 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189534

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189534

Key words

Navigation