Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous endoscopic external ring (PEER) hernioplasty

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This pilot study was conducted to determine if percutaneous endoscopic external ring (PEER) hernioplasty would be a viable alternative to the conventional and laparoscopic methods of tension-free repair. The procedure consists of (1) a 2.0–2.5-cm incision over the external inguinal ring to reach the emerging spermatic cord structures, and ligation and excision of the hernia sac and (2) insertion of an endoscope-attached retractor through the external ring, into the inguinal canal for visualization, dissection of posterior inguinal wall, and placement of mesh to complete tension-free repair. PEER hernioplasty was used to treat 48 patients with 60 primary hernias (bilateral in 12 patients) between January 1993 and December 1994. Median follow-up was 12 months and ranged from 5 to 22 months. All patients were discharged within 24 h after surgery except for one. All patients resumed their normal activity within 2–3 weeks. Only three complications were encountered (two scrotal hematomas and one inguinal seroma). To date, there has been recurrence of two hernias in one patient. We conclude that PEER hernioplasty is an effective method of repair of primary hernias that is less invasive than the conventional approach and both less invasive and more cost-effective than laparoscopic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amid P, Schulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1993) Critical scrutiny of open “tension-free” hernioplasty. Am J Surg 165: 369–71

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amid PK, Schulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Hakakha M (1994) Biomaterials or abdominal wall surgery and principles of their applications. Langenbecks 379: 169–71

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frimberger E (1989) Operative laparoscopy: cholescystectomy. Endoscopy 21: 299–383

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgibbons R Jr, Camps J, Cornet D, Nguren N, Litke B, Annibali R, Salerno G (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221: 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lichtenstein IL, Schulman AG, Amid PK (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157: 188–93

    Google Scholar 

  6. MacFayden BV, Arregui ME, Corbitt JD, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbon R Jr, Franklin ME, McKernan JB, Olsen DO, Phillips EH, Rosenthal D, Schultz LS, Sewell RW, Smoot RT, Spaw AT, Toy FK, Waddell RL, Zucker KA (1993) Complications of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 7: 155–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. Philips E, Carroll B (1993) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 3: 297–307

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsang S, Normand R, Karlin R (1994) Small bowel obstruction: a morbid complication after laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 60: 332–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ko, S.T., Airan, M., Frank, T. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic external ring (PEER) hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 10, 690–693 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188532

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188532

Key words

Navigation