Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital

  • Original articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This retrospective study reviewed the hospital and professional costs, charges, and reimbursements for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lap chole) and open cholecystectomy (open chole) and compared the two procedures. There was no significant difference in hospital costs between lap and open chole procedures; however, there were marked differences in the categories of costs for each procedure. The mean total (hospital and professional) charge was 8% greater for lap chole. The mean total (hospital and professional) reimbursement for patients with private insurance was 23% greater for lap chole, but no significant difference was seen for patients on Medicare or Medicaid. Lap chole patients returned to work 11 days sooner than open chole patients; this can result in a 69% decrease in short-term disability costs to employers. The clinical variables that significantly affect total charges and reimbursement are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson RE, Hunter JG (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 82–84

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (1993) National Institute of Health consensus development conference statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 390–398

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey RW, Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Scovill WA, Graham SM, Imbembo AL (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 214: 531–541

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (1993) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 466–471

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiogram during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161(3): 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deloitte and Touche (1993) Economic impact of laparoscopic surgery. August 1993.

  8. Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Wahlstrom HE, Sarr MG, Weaver AI, Ilstrup DM (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 67: 449–455

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilchrist BF, Vlessis AA, Kay GA, Swartz K, Dennis D (1991) Open versus closed cholecystectomy: an initial analysis. J Laparoendosc Surg 1: 193–196

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan AM (1991) Hospital charges for laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. JAMA 866: 3425

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelley JE, Burrus RG, Burns RP, Graham LD, Chandler KE (1993) Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients. Am Surg 59: 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Llorente J (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the ambulatory surgery setting. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. McIntyre RC, Zoeter MA, Weil KC, Cohen MM (1992) A comparison of outcome and cost of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparendosc Surg 2: 143–148

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC. (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213(1): 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1990) Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 160(5): 485–489

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 3: 131–133

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO, Daniell JF, Saye WB, McKernan B, Miller W, Hoback M (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Laser Med Surg News Adv 7: 38–40

    Google Scholar 

  18. Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL (1992) Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 114–118

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stoker ME, Vose J, O'Mara P, Maini BS (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. Arch Surg 127: 589–595

    Google Scholar 

  20. Voyles CR (1993) The laparoscopic buck stops here. Am J Surg 165: 472–473

    Google Scholar 

  21. Voyles CR, Petro AB, Meena AL, Haick AJ, Doury AM (1991) A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161(3): 365–370

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zucker KA (1991) Surgical laparoscopy. St Louis, Quality Medical Publishing, pp 115–200

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, 44272, Rootstown, OH, USA

    V. W. Vanek

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Northeastern Ohio University College of Medicine, 44272, Rootstown, OH, USA

    C. C. Bourguet

  3. Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center, 1044 Belmont Avenue, 44501, Youngstown, OH, USA

    V. W. Vanek

Authors
  1. V. W. Vanek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. C. Bourguet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanek, V.W., Bourguet, C.C. The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital. Surg Endosc 9, 314–323 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187776

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187776

Key words

Search

Navigation