Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery

Analysis of 114 cases

  • Original articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to help determine the risks and benefits, we retrospectively analyzed the results of our first 114 laparoscopically assisted bowel procedures. Procedures performed consisted of partial colectomy (85), total or subtotal abdominal colectomy (8), total proctocolectomy with J-pouch ileal reservoir (11), and diverting procedures (10). Forty-nine procedures were for malignancy. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was 13.2%. Oral feedings were resumed in 2.4 days (range 1–5), and bowel function returned in 3.8 days (range 2–8). The average length of stay was 4.2 days for partial colectomy and 6 days for total, subtotal, and proctocolectomy. The mean return to normal activity for all groups was 16.7 days (10.8 days for partial colectomy). There were no deaths. Major morbidity (6%) consisted of abscess (3), anastomotic leak (2), and hemorrhage (1). Mean operative costs analyzed for the initial 37 patients were higher for laparoscopic colectomies when compared to traditional colectomies; however, the mean total hospital costs were less for the laparoscopic procedures. These data suggest that the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resection is an acceptable alternative to laparotomy for a variety of disease processes, allowing patients an early return to normal activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush A, Nagan RF (1991) In selected patients outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and significantly reduces hospitalization charges. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 240–245

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berci G, Sackier JM (1991) The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooperman AM, Katz V, Zimmon D, Botero G (1991) Laparoscopic colon resection: a case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1(4): 221–224

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, et al. (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Scovill WA, Zucker KA (1991) The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 161: 388–392

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hammond DC, Lane FR, Mackeigan JM, Passinault WJ (1993) Am Surg 59: 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Ambroze W, Pennington E (1993) Laparoscopic repair of small bowel and colon. Surg Endosc 7: 88–89

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

  10. Redwine DB, Sharpe DR (1991) Laparoscopic segmental resection of the sigmoid colon endometriosis. J Laparoendosc Surg 1(4): 217–220

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reich H, McGlynn F, Budin R (1991) Laparoscopic repair of full-thickness bowel injury. J Laparoendosc Surg 1(2): 119–122

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robbins SL, et al. (1984) Pathologic basis of disease. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, pp 854–874

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scoggin SD, Frzee RC (1992) Laparoscopically assisted resection of a colonic lipoma. J Laparoendosc Surg 2(3): 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shottenfeld D, Winawer SJ (1982) Large intestine. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds): Cancer: epidemiology and prevention. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 703–709

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wexner SD, Johnsen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1991) Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 651–655

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wexner SD, Johansen OB (1992) Laparoscopic bowel resection: advantages and limitations. Ann Med 24: 105–110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tucker, J.G., Ambroze, W.L., Orangio, G.R. et al. Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery. Surg Endosc 9, 297–300 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187772

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187772

Key words

Navigation