Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp 559–564 | Cite as

Abdominal aorta: characterisation of blood flow and measurement of its regional distribution by cine magnetic resonance phase-shift velocity mapping

  • M. Amanuma
  • R. H. Mohiaddin
  • M. Hasegawa
  • A. Heshiki
  • D. B. Longmore
Original Articles Cardiovascular radiology

Abstract

Magnetic resonance phase-shift-induced velocity mapping is a powerful technique for measuring in vivo blood velocity and flow non-invasively. Using this method we examined dimensions, distensibility, blood flow and its regional distribution in the abdominal aorta in 10 normal volunteers. Data were acquired at three levels of the descending aorta. Thirty percent reduction in diastolic cross sectional area was observed in the caudal direction between these levels. Total blood flow (ml/min) in the abdominal aorta at the three sites was 4094 ± 1600, 2339 ± 910 and 1602 ± 549 respectively. Flows in the coeliac trunk, superior mesenteric artery and renal arteries were also calculated. The net flow in the abdominal aorta above the coeliac trunk was persistently forward, while there was considerable backflow (13% of total instantaneous flow) below the renal arteries during early diastole. Magnetic resonance imaging is a non-invasive technique for quantitative assessment of blood flow in the abdominal aorta and its main branches.

Key words

Abdominal aorta Blood flow Distensibility Magnetic resonance imaging Renal flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kitty SS, Schmidt CF (1948) The nitrogen oxide method for quantitative determination of cerebral blood flow in man: theory, procedure and normal values. J Clin Invest 27: 476–484Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grean PA, Pratt T, Davies GJ, Myers M, Lavender P, Maseri A (1986) The fractional distribution of the cardiac output in man using microspheres labelled with technetium-99m. Br J Radiol 59: 209–215Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor KJW, Burns PN, Woodcock JP, Wells PNT (1985) Blood flow in deep abdominal and pelvic vessels: ultrasonic pulsed-doppler analysis. Radiology 154: 487–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldberg BB (1984) Abdominal ultrasonography, 2nd edn. New York, WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bryant DJ, Payne JA, Firmin DN, Longmore DB (1984) Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8: 429–436Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nayler GL, Firmin DN, Longmore DB (1986) Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10: 715–722Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipsteon RH, Underwood SR, Rees RSO, Longmore DB (1987) In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11: 751–756Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Underwood SR, Firmin DN, Klipstein RH, Rees RSO, Longmore DB (1987) Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. Br Heart J 57: 404–412Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moran PR (1982) A flow velocity zeumatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging 1: 197–203Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, Underwood SR, Rees RSO, Longmore DB (1987) Blood flow patterns in the human aorta studied by magnetic resonance. Br Heart J 58: 316–323Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bogren HG, Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, Underwood SR, Rees RSO, Longmore DB (1989) Pulmonary artery distensibility and blood flow patterns: a magnetic resonance study of normal subjects and of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am Heart J 118: 990–999Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maier SE, Meier D, Boesiger P, Moser UT, Vieli A (1989) Human abdominal aorta: comparative measurements of blood flow with MR imaging and multigated doppler US. Radiology 171: 487–492Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohiaddin RH, Wann S, Underwood SR, Firmin DN, Rees RO, Longmore DB (1990) Vena caval flow: assessment with cine MR velocity mapping. Radiology 177: 537–541Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amanuma M, Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ et al. (1989) Cine magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary venous flow. Berkeley: Abstr SMRM 8: 314Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lanzer P, McKibbin W, Bohning D, Pohost G (1989) Quantitation of abdominal aortic wall dynamics in man by gradient echo NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 13: 407–415Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark RA, Colley DP, Jacobson ED, Herman R, Tyler G, Stahl D (1980) Superior mesenteric angiography and blood flow measurement following intra-arterial injection of prostaglandin E1. Radiology 134: 327–333Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crean PA, Pratt T, Davies GJ, Mayers M, Lavender P, Maseri A (1986) The fractional distribution of the cardiac output in man using microspheres labelled with technetium-99m. Br J Radiol 59: 209–215Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sato S, Ohnishi, Sugita S, Okuda K (1987) Splenic artery and superior mesenteric blood flow: nonsurgical doppler US measurement in healthy subjects and patients with chronic liver disease. Radiology 164: 347–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Firmin DN, Klipstein RH, Hounsfield GL, Paley MP, Longmore DB (1989) Echo planer flow velocity mapping in high resolution. Magn Reson Med 12: 316–327Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Amanuma
    • 1
  • R. H. Mohiaddin
    • 2
  • M. Hasegawa
    • 1
  • A. Heshiki
    • 1
  • D. B. Longmore
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologySaitama Medical SchoolIruma, SaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Magnetic Resonance UnitRoyal Brompton HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations