Skip to main content
Log in

One hundred consecutive laparoscopic cholangiograms

Results and conclusions

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: In 100 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the feasibility, reliability, and cost of routine laparoscopic cholangiography were prospectively studied.

Methods: Fluoroscopic cholangiograms with multiple exposures were successfully completed in all patients in an average time of 6.9 min.

Results: Twenty-one percent were abnormal, and 15 common duct stones and 6 significant anatomic anomalies detected. Thirteen out of 15 patients with common duct stones had preoperative suspicion of common duct stones. Two out of 15 were completely unsuspected. The average cost of cholangiography was $768, and there were no complications related to the procedure. There were no false interpretations.

Conclusions: When compared with selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), routine laparoscopic cholangiography is safer, more accurate, and less costly, and may have the added benefit of potentially reducing iatrogenic injuries in patients with anatomic variations. Routine laparoscopic cholangiography should be considered by all surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arregui M, Davis C, Arkush A, Nagan R (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with ERCP and stone extraction and EHL for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6: 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baird D, Wilson J, Mason E, Ducan T, Evans J, Luke J, Ruben D, Lucas G (1992) An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital. Ann Surg 58(3): 206–210

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barkun JS, Fried GM, Barkun AN, Sigman HH, Hinchey JE, Garzon J, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL (1993) Cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 218(3): 371–379

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berci G, Hamlin JA, eds (1981) Operative biliary radiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burrell M, et al (1991) The biliary tract: imaging for the 1990's. AJR 157: 223–233

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll B, Phillips E, Chandra M, Fallas M (1993) Laparoscopic transcystic duct dilation of the sphincter of Oddi. Surg Endosc 7: 514–517

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll B, Phillips E, et al. Laparoscopic transcystic choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc (in press)

  8. Carroll B, Phillips E (1993) Laparoscopic removal of common duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 3(2)

  9. Clair D, Carr-Locke D, Becker J, Brooks D (1993) Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 128: 551–554

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cotton P, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3): 383–393

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen MH, Kairesen R, Nygaard K, Solheim Kaare, Amlie EJB, Havig O, Rosseland AR (1993) Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy; long term follow up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 113(3): 318–323

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson AS, Ferrara JJ, Steinbers SM, Gassen GM, Hollier LH, Flint LM (1993) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: sphincterotomy versus common bile duct exploration. Am Surg 59: 78–84

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lillemoe K, Yeo CH, Talamini M et al. (1992) Selective cholangiography. Ann Surg 215(6): 669–676

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mirizzi PL (1932) La colangiografia durante las operaciones de las vias biliares. Bol Trab Soc Cirug Buenos Aires, 16: No. 24, 1133, No. 27 1266, No. 30, 1413–1466

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G (1992) Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era: a standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127: 400–403

    Google Scholar 

  16. NIH Consensus Conference (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 269(8): 1018–1024

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petelin J (1993) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 165: 487–491

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips E (1993) Routine vs selective intraoperative cholangiography. Am J Surg 165: 505–507

    Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips E, Carroll B, et al. (1993) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17: 22–28

    Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips E, Daykhovsky L, Carroll B (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: instrumentation and technique. J Laparoendosc Surg 1: 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenthal RJ, Steigerwald S, Imig R, Brandt P, Bockhorn H Appraisal of the role of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc (in press)

  22. Soper N, Brunt L, Kerbel K (1994) New Engl J Med 330(6): 409–419

    Google Scholar 

  23. Surick B, Washington M, Ghazi A (1993) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7: 388–392

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, B.J., Phillips, E.H., Rosenthal, R. et al. One hundred consecutive laparoscopic cholangiograms. Surg Endosc 10, 319–323 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187380

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187380

Key words

Navigation