Skip to main content
Log in

Technique and results of routine dynamic cholangiography during 528 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy a trend toward more extensive preoperative diagnostic study of the biliary tree by intravenous cholangiography or ERCP has been observed. However, both exams have technical limitations and are not without risk. We report our experience with 500 consecutive routine dynamic intraoperative cholangiographies during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 97% of which were successful. No lesions from cholangiography were observed. In ten patients clips on the cystic artery appeared on intraoperative cholangiogram to be too close to the hepatic duct and were removed. Anomalies of surgical importance were discovered in 11 patients (2.3%). Unsuspected stones were found in 18 cases (3.7%) and suspected stones confirmed in 12 (2.4%). In our experience routine dynamic intraoperative cholangiography provided important information in 51 cases out of 500 (10.2%). We conclude that routine dynamic intraoperative cholangiography is extremely useful for safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cost containment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cotton PB (1993) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 474–478

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC (1992) Mechanisms of major injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 196–202

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghazi A, Washington M (1990) Endoscopic diagnosis and management of diseases of the pancreas and hepatobiliary tract. In: Donahue PE (ed) Problems in gastrointestinal endoscopy. (Nyhus LM [ed] Problems in general surgery) JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gregg RO (1988) The case for selective cholangiography. Am J Surg 155: 540–544

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller BM, Kozarek RA, Ryan JA Jr, Ball TJ, Traverso LW (1988) Surgical versus endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 207: 135–141

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moossa AR, Easter DW, Van Sonnenberg E, Casola G, D'Agostino H (1992) Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. Ann Surg 215: 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  7. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP (1987) Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J 294: 470–474

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pappas TN, Slimane TB, Brooks DC (1990) 100 Consecutive common duct explorations without mortality. Ann Surg 211: 260–262

    Google Scholar 

  9. Petelin JB (1991) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 33–41

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ (1993) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common duct exploration. SAGES Scientific Session (Abstract) S11: 49

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stain SC, Cohen H, Tsuishoysha M, Donovan AJ (1991) Coledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 213: 627–634

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Mansour A, Pearlman N, Reveille RM, Norton L (1992) Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 163: 227–230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lezoche, E., Paganini, A., Guerrieri, M. et al. Technique and results of routine dynamic cholangiography during 528 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 8, 1443–1447 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187356

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187356

Key words

Navigation