Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors report on a group of 114 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones who were treated by laparoscopic surgery. Management through the cystic duct was considered the first option. Choledochotomy was used for those patients in which the cystic approach was not possible or was unsuccessful. Transcystic lithotripsy was considered for patients with CBD stones in disproportion with the size of the cystic duct. Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was indicated as a drainage procedure. The transcystic approach was used in 89.5% of the patients; choledochotomy was used in 6.2%; and both ways were used in 4.3%. Different procedures were used, including mechanical and electrohydraulic lithotripsy, choledochotomy with T-tube or endoprostheses drainage, laparoscopic sphincterotomy, end-to-end common bile duct anastomosis, and choledochoduodenum anastomosis. One of the patients was in the 21st week of pregnancy. The laparoscopic approach to choledocholithiasis was successfully performed in 94.8% of the patients. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days. There was a 6.2% incidence of complications and the mortality rate was 0.9%. In 84.3% of the patients, the transcystic approach was used successfully, with a complication rate of 4.9% and a mean hospital stay of 1.6 days. Three patients were converted to open surgery early in this series. Thus far, one patient has presented residual CBD stones. The results obtained suggest that laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a technically feasible procedure, with low complication and mortality rates, although it requires adequate selection of patients and a variety of techniques and types of equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aliperti G, Edmundowicz SA, Soper NJ (1991) Combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystolithiasis. Ann Intern Med 115: 783–784

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, Nagan RF (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystecomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6: 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broughman T, Sivak M, Herman R (1985) The management of retained and recurrent common bile duct stones. Surgery 98(4): 746–751

    Google Scholar 

  4. Classen M, Demling L (1974) Endoscopishe sphinkterotomie der papilla Vater. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 99: 496

    Google Scholar 

  5. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M, Machado M (1993) Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(3): 157–160

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovil WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg 300: 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geisinger MA (1991) Percutaneous biliary stone extraction. Radiologic and combined endoscopic techniques. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1: (1)105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginard LM, Legros G (1981) Retained and recurrent bile duct stones. Surgical or nonsurgical removal. Ann Surg 193: 150–154

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hauer-Jensen M, Karensen R, Nygaarch K (1985) Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indications: a prospective evaluation. Ann Surg 202: 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter JG (1992) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 163: 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson IM (1989) ERCP: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. New York, Elsevier Science

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kozarek RA, Traverso LW (1991) Endoscopic stent placement for cystic duct leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 37: 356–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levine SB, Lerner SJ, Leifer ED (1983) Intraoperative cholangiography: a review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups. An Surg 198: 692–697

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mc Sherry CK, Glenn F (1980) The incidence and causes of death following surgery for non-malignant biliary tract disease. Ann Surg 191: 271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahrwold D (1986) The biliary system. In: Sabiston DC (ed) Textbook of surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petelin J (1991) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 33–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein R, Daykhovsky L, Falas MJ (1993) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17: 22–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rolfsmeyer ES, Burrich MP, Kollitz PR, Onstad GR, Hitchock CR (1962) The value of operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154: 369

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rustgi AK, Shapiro RH (1991) Biliary stents for common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1: (1)79–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2(3): 191–198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DePaula, A.L., Hashiba, K. & Bafutto, M. Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 8, 1399–1403 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187344

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187344

Key words

Navigation