Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 170–177 | Cite as

Transformation of 16-dehydroprogesterone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone by Mucor piriformis

  • K. M. Madyastha
  • T. Joseph
Biotechnology Original Paper

Abstract

Mucor piriformis was used to study the mode of transformation of 16-dehydroprogesterone (I, pregna-4, 16-diene-3, 20-dione) and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (II, 17α-hydroxypregn-4-ene-3, 20-dione). Biotransformation products formed from I were 14α-hydroxypregna-4, 16-diene-3, 20-dione (Ia), 7α, 14α-dihydroxypregna-4, 16-diene-3, 20-dione (Ib), 3β, 7α, 14α-trihydroxy-5α-pregn-16-en-20-one (Ic), and 3α, 7α, 14α-trihydroxy-5α-pregn-16-en-20-one (Id). Metabolites Ic and Id appear to be hitherto unknown. Time-course studies suggested that the transformation is initiated by hydroxylation at the 14α-position (Ia) followed by hydroxylation at the 7α-position (Ib). Microsomes (105,000 g sediment) prepared from 16-dehydroprogesterone-induced cells hydroxylate I to its 14α-hydroxy derivative (Ia) in the presence of NADPH. Incubation of Ia with the organism resulted in the formation of Ib, Ic and Id. Biotransformation products formed from compound II were 17α, 20α-dihydroxypregn-4-en-3-one (IIa), 7α, 17α-dihydroxypregn-4-ene-3, 20-dione (IIb), 6β, 17α, 20α-trihydroxypregn-4-en-3-one (IIc) and 11α, 17α, 20α-trihydroxypregn-4-en-3-one (IId). Time-course studies indicated that IIa is the initial product formed, which is further hydroxylated either at the 6β or 11α position. Incubation of IIa with the organism resulted in the formation of IIc and IId. Reduction of the 4-en-3-one system and 20-keto group has not been observed before in organisms of the order Mucorales. In addition, M. piriformis has been shown to carry out hydroxylation at the C-6, C-7, C-11 and C-14 positions in the steroid molecules tested.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhacca NS, Williams DH (1964) Application of NMR spectroscopy in organic chemistry. Illustrations from the steroid field. Holden-Day, San Francisco, USA, pp 19–24Google Scholar
  2. Bridgeman JE, Cherry PC, Clegg AS, Evans JM, Jones ERH, Kasal A, Kumar V, Meakins GD, Morisawa Y, Richards EE, Woodgate PD (1970) Microbiological hydroxylation of steroids. Part I. Proton magnetic resonance spectra of ketones, alcohols and acetates in the androstone, pregnane and estrane series. J Chem Soc C-:250–257Google Scholar
  3. Budzikiewicz H (1972) Steroids. In: Biochemical applications in mass spectrometry. G. R. Waller (ed) Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 251–289Google Scholar
  4. Charney W, Herzog HL (1967) Microbial transformations of steroids: a handbook. Academic press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Eroshin VK (1962) Capacity of Mucorales fungi to oxidize steroid S. Mikrobiologiya 31:608–615Google Scholar
  6. Holland HL, Riemland E (1985) Microbial hydroxylation of steroids 10. Rearrangement during epoxidation and hydroxylation and the stepwise nature of these enzymic reactions. Can J Chem 63:1121–1126Google Scholar
  7. Holland HL, Thomas EM (1982) Microbial hydroxylation of steroids. 8. Incubation of Cn halo- and other substituted steroids with Cn hydroxylating fungi. Can J Chem 60:160–164Google Scholar
  8. Holland HL, Chenchaiah PC, Thomas EM, Mader B, Dennis MJ (1984) Microbial hydroxylation of steroids. 9. Epoxidation of 6-3-keto steroids by Rhizopus arrhizus ATCC11145, and the mechanism of the 6β hydroxylase enzyme. Can J Chem 62:2740–2747Google Scholar
  9. Krishnan R, Madyastha KM, Viswamitra MA (1991) The crystal structure of 14α, 17β-dihydroxyandrost-4-en-3-one monohydrate and 14α, 17β-dihydroxyandrost-1,4-diene-3-one monohydrate. Steroids 56:440–445Google Scholar
  10. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Madyastha KM, Joseph T (1993) Studies on the 14α-hydroxylation of progesterone in Mucor piriformis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 45:563–569Google Scholar
  12. Madyastha KM, Srivatsan J (1987) Novel transformation of progesterone by a Mucor sp. Can J Microbiol 33:361–365Google Scholar
  13. Madyastha KM, Jayanthi CR, Madyastha P, Sumathi D (1984) Studies on the microsomal 11α-hydroxylation of progesterone in A. ochraceus: isolation, characterization and solubilization of the hydroxylase system. Can J Biochem Cell Biol 62:100–107Google Scholar
  14. Mahato SB, Banarjee S (1986) Metabolism of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone by a Bacillus species. Biochem J 239:473–476Google Scholar
  15. Murray HC, Peterson DH (1957) 8-Hydroxy-11-deoxycorticosterones. U.S. patent no. 2,800,490Google Scholar
  16. Prema BR, Bhattacharyya PK (1962) Microbiological transformation of terpenes II. Transformation of α-pinene. Appl Microbiol 10:524–528Google Scholar
  17. Siekmann L, Disse B, Breuer H (1980) Biosynthesis and metabolism of 16α, 17α-epoxy-C21-steroids in rat liver microsomes. J Steroid Biochem 13:1181–1205Google Scholar
  18. Singh K, Sehgal SN, Vezina C (1967) Transformation of steroids by Mucor griseocyanus. Can J Microbiol 13:1271–1281Google Scholar
  19. Vezina C, Singh K (1975) Transformation of organic compounds by fungal spores. In: Smith JE, Berry DR (eds) Filamentous fungi, vol I. Edward Arnold, London, pp 158–192Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Madyastha
    • 1
  • T. Joseph
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Organic Chemistry, Bio-organic SectionIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations