Skip to main content
Log in

Juricas: Legal computer advice systems

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the late seventies at the Centre for Computers and Law research was started to find means for supporting lawyers' work with the aid of a computer. The research project was called JURICAS. In 1982 a prototype of a JURICAS system was produced and since 1986 seven advisory packages have been brought out on the market in the Netherlands. These packages consist of two main parts, an author's shell and an advisory program. The user cannot make changes to either the shell or the program.

In 1988 the JURICAS author's shell became commercially available. A buyer has to make his own advisory program and fill it with his expertise to produce an advisory package. To facilitate the designing, the typing in and the testing of a package a number of utility programs are included in the author's system.

An example of a self-developed legal computer advice system is a JURICAS system for Social Security Law. This system was written by two lawyers of a social security service in the Netherlands and helps with the processing of requests for social security. In May 1991 the computer advice system was put into use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Feigenbaum, E.A. 1977. The Art of Artificial intelligence: Themes and Case Studies of Knowledge Engineering. In International Journal for Computers and Artificial Intelligence 5.

  • Koers, A.W., Kracht, D., Smith M., Smits J.M., & Weusten M.C.M., 1989. Knowledge Based Systems in law. Kluwer: Deventer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijnse, W & Beek, A. 1989. Hoofdlijnen van de administratieve automatisering. Wolters-Noordhoff: Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leith, P. 1991. The Computerised Lawyer: A Guide to the Use of Computers in the Legal Profession. Springer Verlag: London, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R.V. De, van der Wees, J.G.L & Koers. J. 1992. Opsporing sociale zekerheids-fraude per computer. In Toogdagbundel Juridische Informatiesystemen, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Informatica en Recht, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R.V. De, van Noortwijk C., Kerkmeester H.O & van der Wees J.G.L. 1990. Knowledge Systems and Law — The JURICAS Project. In proceedings DEXA 90 (Database and Expert Systems Applications) Springer-Verlag: Vienna, Austria, pp. 112–115.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • See for a description of SENPRO the report: Mulder, R.V. De, A. Oskamp, W. van der Heyden and H.M. Gubby. 1982. Sentencing by computer: an experiment. Norwegian Research Centre for Computers and Law, Oslo University, Norway. For a summary, see R.V. De Mulder and H.M. Gubby. 1983. Legal Desicion-making by Computer: an Experiment in Sentencing. In Computer Law Journal, Summer 1983, and R.V. De Mulder and H.M. Gubby. 1984. Sentencing by computer: A Step forward?. In Law/Technology 17(1): 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Noortwijk, C. van. 1990a. Criteria in the JURICAS Project. In proceedings of The Second International Conference of the Dutch Foundation for Legal Knowledge Systems. Koninklijke Vermande: Lelystad, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noortwijk, C. van, Piepers P.A.W. & van der Wees, J.G.L, 1990b. The JURICAS-system in practice: decisions in a social security environment. In proceedings of The Thirds International Conference of the Dutch Foundation for Legal Systems. Koninklijke Vermande: Lelystad, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niewenhuis, M.A. 1989. TESSEC: An Expert System for the Dutch Social Security Act. Ph. D. diss, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, A. 1990. Het ontwikkelen van juridische expertsystemen. Ph. D. diss, Kluwer: Deventer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliwala, A. 1991. Information Technology in Legal Education: a Resource Book, CTI Law Technology Centre: Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepers, P.A.W. 1992. The Appication of Computerised Document Assembly and Expert Systems in Legal Practise. In proceedings Computers and Law, Administration of Justice and Law Practice, section C3.4, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1–7.

  • Susskind, R.E. 1987. Expert Systems in Law, A Jurisprudential Inquiry. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, R. & Capper, P.N. 1989. The Latent Damage System — A First Generation Expert System in Law, in: Martino, A.A. (eded), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Logics, Informatics and Law, Florence, Italy.

  • Waterman, D.A. 1986. A Guide to Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley: Reading, Ma., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G.D. 1990. On the Classification and Evaluation of Knowledge Based Systems in Law. In proceedings of The Second International Conference of the Dutch Foundation for Legal Knowledge Systems. Koninklijke Vermande: Lelystad, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Wees, J.G.L. Juricas: Legal computer advice systems. Artif Intell Law 1, 275–290 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186724

Keywords

Navigation