Skip to main content
Log in

Is an isthmus block a prerequisite for the development of an attic retraction cholesteatoma?

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Computed tomography (CT) was used to investigate whether an isthmus block was present in 57 cases with attic retraction cholesteatomas. A ventilation route between the mesotympanum and attic was considered to exist in 30% of the cases and occurred predominantly in those ears with a cholesteatoma that did not extend into the antrum. Four cases were also found to have this ventilation route in CT scans taken before and after the development of cholesteatoma. These findings suggest that an isthmus block is not a prerequisite for the development of an attic retraction cholesteatoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bezold F (1891) Über das Cholesteatom des Mittelohrs. Z Ohrenheilkd 21:252–263

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chole RA, Tinling SP (1985) Basal lamina breaks in the histogenesis of cholesteatoma. Larnygoscope 95:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  3. Habermann J (1889) Zur Entstehung des Cholesteatoms des Mittelohrs. Arch Ohrenheilkd 27:42–50

    Google Scholar 

  4. Honda Y, Umezawa Y (1983) Pathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Oto-Rhino-Larnygol Tokyo 26:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morimitsu T, Nagai T, Nagai M, Ide M, Makino K, Tono T, Adachi Y, Kasano F, Fukiyama M, Hayashi A (1989) Pathogenesis of cholesteatoma based on clinical results of anterior tympanotomy. Auris Nasus Larynx (Tokyo) 16 [Suppl 1]: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ojala L, Saxen A (1951) Pathogenesis of middle-ear cholesteatoma arising from Shrapnell's membrane (attic cholesteatoma). Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) [Suppl] 101:33–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pfaltz CR (1988) Retraction pocket and development of cholesteatoma in children. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 40:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruedi L (1959) Cholesteatoma formation in the middle ear in animal experiments. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 50:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sadd J, Babiacki A, Pinkus G (1983) The metaplasia and congenital origin of cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 96:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shambaugh GE Jr, Glasscock ME III (1980) Pathology and clinical course of inflammatory diseases of the middle ear. In: Shambaugh GE Jr, Glasscock ME III (eds) Surgery of the ear, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 186–220

    Google Scholar 

  11. Swartz JD (1986) The middle ear and mastoid. In: Swartz JD (ed) Imaging of the temporal bone. Thieme, New York, pp 33–95

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi H, Hayashi M, Sato H, Honjo I (1987) Chronological changes of pars flaccida in OME after insertion of ventilating tube. In: Sadd J (ed) The eustachian tube. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tos M (1988) Incidence, etiology and pathogenesis of cholesteatoma in children. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 40:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tumarkin A (1938) A contribution to the study of middle-ear suppuration with special reference to the pathology and treatment of cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol 53:685–710

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tumarkin A (1961) Pre-epidermosis. J Laryngol Otol 75:487–500

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wittmaack K (1933) Wie entsteht ein genuines Cholesteatom? Arch Ohrenheilkd 137:306–332

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamasoba, T., Kikucbi, S. Is an isthmus block a prerequisite for the development of an attic retraction cholesteatoma?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 250, 300–303 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186231

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186231

Key words

Navigation