Abstract
This study analyses an economic model of pregnancy resolution; that is, a model of the choice by a pregnant woman to abort her fetus or carry it to term. This analysis, using an analytical model derived from the household utility framework, adds to previous research by presenting race and residence specific estimates of how individual characteristics, history of abortion, and the community-based factors determine women's choices of giving birth vs. abortion. The main data for estimating the model were drawn from the 1984 vital statistics of all induced abortions and live births in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The major findings indicate that low parental education, high maternal age, previous early abortions, and the availability of abortion providers all significantly reduce the probability of choosing the live birth option. Married status and the availability of family planning clinics significantly increase the probability of the live birth option. The findings also suggest that women's choices between abortion and live birth vary substantially with race (white vs. black) and residential (urban vs. rural) location.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75:493–517
Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81 (2):279–288
Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S (1989) Discrete choice analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
Cates W Jr (1984) Induced abortion: In: Michael B (ed) Perinatal epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press
Easterlin R, Crimmins E (1985) Fertility resolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Fuchs V (1983) How we live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Greene W (1990) Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan
Grossman M (1972) On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 80:223–255
Grossman M, Joyce T (1990) Unobservables, pregnancy resolutions, and birth weight production functions in New York city. J Polit Econ 98 (5) 2:983–1007
Henshaw SK, Silverman J (1988) The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of US abortion patients. Family Planning Perspectives 20:158–168
Hoffman SD, Foster EM, Furstenberg FF (1993) Reevaluating the costs of teenage childbearing. Demography 30:1–13
King R, Myers S, Byrne D (1992) The demand for abortion by unmarried teenagers. Am J Econ Soc 51:222–235
Klerman LV, Jekel JK (1984) Unwanted pregnancy. In: Bracken M (ed) Perinatal epidemiology. New York: Oxford Univ Press
Leibowitz A, Eison M, Chow WK (1986) An economic model of teenage pregnancy decision-making. Demography 23:67–77
Lewin T (1992) Hurdles increase for many women seeking abortions. The New York Times, March 15, 1992
Manski C (1977) The structure of random utility models: Theory and Dicision 8:229–254
McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarebka P (ed) Frontier in econometrics. New York: Academic Press
Medoff M (1988) An economic analysis of the demand for abortions. Econ Inquiry XXVI: 353–359
Michael RT (1973) Education and the derived demand for children. J Polit Econ 81(2):128–164
Montgomery MR (1987) A new look at the easterlin “Synthesis” framework. Demography 24:481–496
Nakosteen R, Zimmer M (1980) Migration and income: the question of self-selection. South Econ J 46:840–851
Powell-Griner E, Trent K (1987) Sociodemographic determinants of abortion in the United States. Demography 24:533–561
Tietz C (1978) Repeat abortion-why more? Family Planning Perspectives 10:286–288
Torres A, Forrest JD (1988) Why do women have abortions? Family Planning Perspectives 20:169–176
Westoff CF (1988) Contraceptive paths toward the reduction of unintended pregnancy and abortion. Family Planning Perspectives 20:4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am very grateful to Professors Michael Grossman and Theodore Joyce at CUNY/NBER for their advice and comments on earlier version of this paper, to Professors William Hsiao at Harvard and Richard Ernst at USC for their supportive encouragement and insightful comments, and finally to two anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions in revising this analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, G.G. An economic analysis of pregnancy resolution in Virginia: specific as to race and residence. J Popul Econ 8, 253–264 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185252
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185252