Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overview of the current status of total androgen deprivation in metastasized prostate cancer

  • Free Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Metastatic prostate cancer, the dominant malignant disease in men over the age of 50 years, is a hormone-responsive malignancy for which hormonal manipulation is the mainstay in the initial treatment. Maximal androgen deprivation, by which both testicular and adrenal androgens are blocked, certainly seems a preferential approach in patients with good prognostic characteristics such as a good performance status, asymptomatic disease with minimal metastatic involvement, low alkaline phosphatase levels at the time of diagnosis, and a rapid decrease in PSA to normal levels after the initiation of the therapy. Surgical castration, although effective, seems to be inferior to depot LHRH therapy with respect to patients' acceptance and preference. Nonsteroidal antiandrogens seem to have advantages over steroidal compounds in terms of both efficacy and side effects. The ultimate goal in the management of metastatic prostate cancer is to characterize the patients and their tumors in such a way that a more individually selected approach becomes possible. In the future this goal will be reached by the inclusion of more sophisticated molecular biological parameters in the prognostic evaluation and by newer and better forms of both hormonal and nonhormonal combination therapy that are adapted to the needs of the individual patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires TT, Tong T (1991) Cancer statistics 1991. CA 41:19–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maatman TJ, Gupta MK, Montie JE (1985) Effectiveness of castration versus intravenous estrogen therapy in producing rapid endocrine control of metastatic cancer of the prostate. J Urol 133:620–621

    Google Scholar 

  3. Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (VACURG) (1967) Treatment and survival of patients with cancer of the prostate. Surg Gynecol Obstet 124:1011–1017

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schally AV, Arimura A, Coy DH (1981) Recent approaches to fertility control based on derivates of LHRH. In: Manson PL, Diezfalushy E, Gloves J, Olson RE (eds) Vitamins and hormones vol 39. Harrod Bruce Jovannovich, St Louis, pp 257–323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leuprolide Study Group (1984) Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 311:1281–1286

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith JA (1987) New methods of endocrine management of prostate cancer. J Urol 137:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peeling WB (1989) Phase III studies to compare gosereline (Zoladex) with orchiectomy and with diethylstilbestrol in treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Urology 33 [Suppl 5]:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henriksson P, Johansson SE (1987) Prediction of cardiovascular complications in patients with prostatic cancer treated with estrogen. Am J Epidemiol 125:970–978

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford ED, Blumenstein BA, Goodman PJ et al (1990) Leuprolide with and without flutamide in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 66 [Suppl 5]:1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denis L, Smith P, Carneiro de Moura JL, Bono A, Keuppens F et al (1991) Total androgen ablation: European experience. Urol Clin North Am 18:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chadwick DJ (in press) Medical or surgical castrations: the patient's choice. Curr Opin Urol

  12. Samdal F, Vada K, Lumomo PI (1991) Orchiectomy or LHRH analogue: which does the patient prefer and what treatment would Norwegian urologists prefer if they had advanced cancer of the prostrate? Scand J Urol Nephrol 25:297–300

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parmar H, Phillips RH, Liehtmann SL, Edward L (1988) How would you like to have an orchiectomy for advanced prostate cancer? Am J Clin Oncol 11:160–168

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cassileth BR, Soloway M, Vogelzang M, Schellhammer P, Caplan R, Kennealey G (1989) Choice of treatment in stage D prostate cancer. Urology [Suppl] 33:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crawford ED, Nabors W (1991) Hormone therapy of advanced prostate cancer: where we stand today. Oncology 5:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  16. Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A, Cusan L, Lacourciere Y, Monfette G et al (1982) New hormonal therapy in prostatic carcinoma: combined treatment with an LHRH agonist and an anti-androgen. Clin Invest Med 5:267–275

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geller J, Vega DJ de la, Albert JD, Nachtsheim DA (1984) Tissue dihydrotestosterone levels and clinical response to hormonal therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 58:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moller Jensen O, Estève J, Moller H, Renard H (1990) Cancer in the European Community and its member states. Eur J Cancer 26:1167–1256

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mulders PFA, Debruyne FMJ, Oosterhof GON (1991) Predicting treatment response in metastatic prostate cancer. Rev Endocrine Rel Cancer 38:5–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debruyne, F.M.J., Witjes, W.P.J. Overview of the current status of total androgen deprivation in metastasized prostate cancer. World J Urol 11, 233–236 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185076

Keywords

Navigation