Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficient pathway for early detection of prostate cancer concluded from a 5-year prospective study

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a prospective study the statistical characteristics of digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and serologic determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were assessed in 1230 patients aged over 40 years. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined to be 80.3%, 69.7%, 58.9%, and 86.7%, respectively, for DRE; 76.5%, 62.3%, 52.3%, and 83.1%, respectively, for TRUS; and 87.9%, 49.6%, 48.5%, and 88.3%, respectively, for PSA (normal level, 4 ng/ml). The data clearly demonstrate the nonsuitability of each single measure for reliable early detection of prostatic carcinoma. Connection of the parameters in all possible combinations under various conditions demonstrated the superiority of the test “DRE and PSA >4 ng/ml” over DRE as the “gold standard” and all other options. The use of this approach as the first-line raster of an algorithm (outlined herein) would allow the detection of prostatic malignancy with a specificity of 86.5% and a positive predictive value of 74.0%. Supplementing this screen with short-term controls in cases in which only one parameter is positive (“DRE or PSA >4 ng/ml”) might enable the detection of almost all patients with prostate cancer. TRUS did not provide any additional information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allhoff E, Bading R, Hoene E, Jonas U (1988) The bifocal multiplane transrectal transducer: a valuable adjunct to physical and immunochemical findings for early detection of prostate cancer. World J Urol 6:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carter HB, Andres R, Metter JE, Fozard JL, Chan DW, Walsh PC (1991) Early detection of prostate cancer using serial PSA measurements. J Urol 145 [Suppl 4]:382A

  3. Catalona WJ (1984) Natural history. In: Catalona WJ (ed) Prostate cancer. Grune & Stratton, Orlando, pp 40–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Dodds KM, Coplen DE, Yuan JJJ, Petros JA, Andriole GL (1991) Measurement of prostate specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 324:1156–1161

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chodak GW, Wald V, Parmer E, Watanabe H, Ohe H, Saitoh M (1986) Comparison of digital examination and transrectal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of prostatic cancer. J Urol 135:951–953

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daehnert WF, Hamper UM, Eggleston JC, Walsh PC, Sanders RC (1986) Prostatic evaluation by transrectal sonography with histopathologic correlation: the echopenic appearance of early carcinoma. Radiology 158:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guinan P, Rubenstein M (1987) Methods of early diagnosis in genitourinary cancer. Cancer 60:668–676

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (eds) (1987) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krauss DJ, Lilien OM (1975) The benign killer: carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 113:820–823

    Google Scholar 

  10. Palken M, Cobb OE, Simons CE, Warren BH, Aldape HC (1991) Prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound for screening. J Urol 145:86–90 (discussion, 90–92)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paulson DF, Lin GH, Hinshaw W, Stephani S, the Uro-Oncology Research Group (1982) Radical surgery versus radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 128:502–504

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prorok PC, Connor RJ, Baker SG (1990) Statistical considerations in cancer screening programs. Urol Clin North Am 17:699–708

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rifkin MD, Friedland GW, Shortliffe L (1986) Prostatic evaluation by transrectal endosonography: detection of carcinoma. Radiology 158:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt JD, Mettlin CJ, Natarajan N, Peace BB, Beart RW Jr, Winchester DP, Murphy GP (1986) Trends in the patterns of care for prostatic cancer, 1974–1983: results of surveys by the American College of Surgeons. J Urol 136:416–421

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson IM, Ernst JJ, Gangai MP, Spence CR (1984) Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of routine urological screening. J Urol 132:690–692

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Acknowledged with the Cancer Award of the State of Lower Saxony, Germany, 1992.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allhoff, E.P., Liedke, S.G., Gonnermann, O. et al. Efficient pathway for early detection of prostate cancer concluded from a 5-year prospective study. World J Urol 11, 201–205 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185069

Keywords

Navigation