Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 347–354 | Cite as

Territory size and defendability in primates

  • C. Lowen
  • R. I. M. Dunbar
Article

Abstract

Mitani and Rodman (1979) showed that a simple measure of the defendability of the range area could differentiate fairly successfully between territorial and non-territorial species of primates. Their analysis has, however, been much criticised on the grounds that it considered only the day journey length and the diameter of the range area. We develop a number of more realistic indices of territory defendability that take into account both the length of the boundary to be defended and the detection distance as well as linear measures of range size. These indices (a) discriminate between territorial and non-territorial species more successfully than the Mitani-Rodman index and (b) allow the results to be extended to species which do not forage in cohesive groups. However, our results suggest that the Mitani-Rodman analysis was in many ways correct.

Key words

Territoriality Mitani-Rodman index Gas model Primates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich-Blake FPG, Bunn T, Dunbar RIM, Headley PM (1971) Observations on baboons, Papio anubis, in an and habitat in Ethiopia. Folia Primatol 15:1–35Google Scholar
  2. Altman SA, Altmann J (1970) Baboon ecology. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesch C, Boesch H (1989) Hunting behaviour of wild chimpanzees in the Tai National Park. Am J Phys Anthropol 78:547–573Google Scholar
  4. Cheney DL (1987) Interactions and relationships between groups. In: Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT (eds) (1987) Primate societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  5. Clarke MR (1983) Infant-killing and infant disappearance following male takeovers in a group of free-ranging howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Costa Rica. Am J Primatol 5: 241–247Google Scholar
  6. Davidge C (1978) Ecology of baboons (Papio ursinus) at Cape Point. Zool Afr 13:329–350Google Scholar
  7. DePew LA (1983) Ecology and behaviour of baboons (Papio anubis) in the Shai Hills Game Production Reserve, Ghana. MSc thesis, Cape Coast University, GhanaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunbar RIM, Dunbar P (1974a) Ecology and population dynamics of Colobus guereza in Ethiopia. Folia Primatol 21:188–209Google Scholar
  9. Dunbar RIM, Dunbar P (1974b) Ecological relations and niche separation between sympatric terrestrial primates in Ethiopia. Folia Primatol 21:36–60Google Scholar
  10. Estrada A (1982) Survey and census of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in the rain forest of “Los Tustlas”, Veracruz, Mexico. Am J Primatol 2:363–372Google Scholar
  11. Goodall J (1965) Chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream Reserve. In: DeVore I (ed) Primate behaviour. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 425–473Google Scholar
  12. Goodall J (1986) The Gombe chimpanzees. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  13. Harding RSO (1976) Ranging patterns of a troop of baboons (Papio anubis) in Kenya. Folia Primatol 25:143–185Google Scholar
  14. Harvey PH, Pagel M (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill CM (1991) A study of territoriality in Cercopithecus diana: do females take an active part in territorial defence? PhD thesis, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Iwamoto T, Dunbar RIM (1983) Thermoregulation, habitat quality and the behavioural ecology of gelada baboons. J Anim Ecol 52:357–366.Google Scholar
  17. Martin RD (1981) Field studies of primate behaviour. Symp Zool Soc Lond 46:287–336Google Scholar
  18. Milton K (1980) The foraging strategies of howler monkeys. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitani JC, Rodman P (1979) Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species: Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:241–251Google Scholar
  20. Nishida T (1968) The social group of wild chimpanzees in the Mahali Mountains. Primates 19:167–224Google Scholar
  21. Nishimura A, Fonseca GAB da, Mittermeier RA, Young AL, Strier KB, Valle CMC (1988) The muriqui, genus Brachyteles. In: Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Coimbra-Filho A, Fonseca GAB da (eds) Ecology and behaviour of Neotropical primates, vol. 2. World Wildlife Fund, Washington D.C., pp 577–610Google Scholar
  22. Oates JF (1977) The social life of a black-and-white colobus monkey, Colobus guereza. Z. Tierpsychol 45:1–60Google Scholar
  23. Rowell TE (1966) Forest-living baboons in Uganda. J Zool Lond 147:344–354Google Scholar
  24. Sharman M (1981) Feeding, ranging and social organisation of the Guinea baboon. PhD thesis, University of St AndrewsGoogle Scholar
  25. Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT (eds) (1987) Primate societies. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Stoltz LP, Saayman GS (1970) Ecology and behaviour of baboons in the Transvaal. Ann Transvaal Mus 26:99–143Google Scholar
  27. Waser PM (1976) Cercocebus albigena: site attachment, avoidance and intergroup spacing. Am Nat 110:911–935Google Scholar
  28. Wrangham RW (1979) On the evolution of ape social systems. Soc Sci Inform18:335–368Google Scholar
  29. Wrangham RW (1986) Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzees. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 352–378Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Lowen
    • 1
  • R. I. M. Dunbar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations