Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 327–345 | Cite as

Fishing and echolocation behavior of the greater bulldog bat, Noctilio leporinus, in the field

  • Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
  • Elisabeth K. V. Kalko
  • Ingrid Kaipf
  • Alan D. Grinnell


When hunting for fish Noctilio leporinus uses several strategies. In high search flight it flies within 20–50 cm of the water surface and emits groups of two to four echolocation signals, always containing at least one pure constant frequency (CF) pulse and one mixed CF-FM pulse consisting of a CF component which is followed by a frequency-modulated (FM) component. The pure CF signals are the longest, with an average duration of 13.3 ms and a maximum of 17 ms. The CF component of the CF-FM signals averages 8.9 ms, the FM sweeps 3.9 ms. The CF components have frequencies of 52.8–56.2 kHz and the FM components have an average bandwidth of 25.9 kHz. A bat in high search flight reacts to jumping fish with “pointed dips” at the spot where a fish has broken the surface. As it descends to the water surface the bat shows the typical approach pattern of all bats with decreasing pulse duration and pulse interval. A jumping fish reveals itself by a typical pattern of temporary echo glints, reflected back to the bat from its body and from the water disturbance. In low search flight N. leporinus drops to a height of only 4–10 cm, with body parallel to the water, legs extended straight back and turned slightly downward, and feet cocked somewhat above the line of the legs and poised within 2–4 cm of the water surface. In this situation N. leporinus emits long series of short CF-FM pulses with an average duration of 5.6 ms (CF 3.1 and FM 2.6) and an average pulse interval of 20 ms, indicating that it is looking for targets within a short range. N. leporinus also makes pointed dips during low search flight by rapidly snapping the feet into the water at the spot where it has localized a jumping fish or disturbance. In the random rake mode, N. leporinus drops to the water surface, lowers its feet and drags its claws through the water in relatively straight lines for up to 10m. The echolocation behavior is similar to that of high search flight. This indicates that in this hunting mode N. leporinus is not pursuing specific targets, and that raking is a random or statistical search for surface fishes. When raking, the bat uses two strategies. In directed random rake it rakes through patches of water where fish jumping activity is high. Our interpretation is that the bat detects this activity by echolocation but prefers not to concentrate on a single jumping fish. In the absence of jumping fish, after flying for several minutes without any dips, N. leporinus starts to make very long rakes in areas where it has hunted successfully before (memory-directed random rake). Hunting bats caught a fish approximately once in every 50–200 passes through the hunting area.

Key words

Bats Fishing Echolocation Hunting behavior 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldridge HDJN (1988) Flight kinematics and energetics in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with reference to the influence of ground effect. J Zool Lond 216:507–517Google Scholar
  2. Altenbach JS (1989) Prey capture by the fishing bats Noctilio leporinus and Myotis vivesi. J Mammal 70:421–424Google Scholar
  3. Benedict JE (1926) Notes on the feeding habits of Noctilio. J Mammal 7:58–59Google Scholar
  4. Bloedel P (1955) Hunting methods of fish-eating bats, particularly Noctilio leporinus. J Mammal 36:390–399Google Scholar
  5. Brooke AP (1994) Diet of the fishing bat, Noctilio leporinus (Chiroptera: Noctilionidae). J Mammal 75:212–218Google Scholar
  6. Brosset AP (1966) La biologic des Chiropteres. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Brosset A, Debouteville CD (1966) Le regime alimentaire du vespertilion de Daubenton Myotis daubentoni. Mammalia 30:247–381Google Scholar
  8. Brown PE, Brown TW, Grinnell AD (1983) Echolocation, development, and vocal communication in the lesser bulldog bat, Noctilio albiventris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:287–298Google Scholar
  9. Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) (1980) Animal sonar systems. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell KA, Suthers RA (1988) Predictive tracking of horizontally moving targets by the fishing bat, Noctilio leporinus. In: Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar processes and performance, Plenum, New York, pp 500–506Google Scholar
  11. Emde G von der, Schnitzler HU (1986) Fluttering target detection in hipposiderid bats. J Comp Physiol A 159:765–772Google Scholar
  12. Emde G von der, Schnitzler HU (1990) Classification of insects by echolocating greater horseshoe bats. J Comp Physiol A 167:423–430Google Scholar
  13. Fenton MB (1990) The foraging behaviour and ecology of animal-eating bats. Can J Zool 86:411–422Google Scholar
  14. Findley JS (1972) Phenetic relationships among bats of the genus Myotis. Syst Zool 21:31–52Google Scholar
  15. Fish FE, Blood BR, Clark BD (1991) Hydrodynamics of the feet of fish-catching bats: influence of the water surface on drag and morphological design. J Exp Zool 258:164–173Google Scholar
  16. Fleming TH, Hooper ET, Wilson DE (1972) Three Central American bat communities: structure, reproductive cycles and movement patterns. Ecology 53:555–569Google Scholar
  17. Goodwin GG (1928) Observations on Noctilio. J Mammal 9:104–113Google Scholar
  18. Griffin DR (1958). Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffin DR, Novick A (1955). Acoustic orientation of neotropical bats. J Exp Zool 130:251–299Google Scholar
  20. Gudger EW (1945) Fisherman bats of the Carribean region. J Mammal 26:1–15Google Scholar
  21. Hartley DJ, Campbell KA, Suther RA (1989) The acoustic behavior of the fish-eating bat, Noctilio leporinus, during prey capture. J Acoust Soc Am 86:8–27Google Scholar
  22. Hood CS, Jones JK Jr (1984) Noctilio leporinus. Mammal Species 216:1–7Google Scholar
  23. Hooper ET, Brown JH (1968) Foraging and breeding in two sympatric species of neotropical bats, genus Noctilio. J Mammal 49:310–312Google Scholar
  24. Howell DJ, Burch D (1974) Food habits of some Costa Rican bats. Rev Biol Trop 21:281–294Google Scholar
  25. Kalko EKV (1991) Das Echoortungs- und Jagdverhalten der drei europäischen Zwergfledermausarten Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774), Pipistrellus nathusii (Keyserling et Blasius, 1839) und Pipistrellus kuhli (Kuhl, 1819) im Freiland. PhD thesis, Faculty of Biology, University of Tubingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalko EKV, Schnitzler HU (1989a) Two wavefront interference patterns in frequency-modulated echolocation signals of bats flying low over water. J Acoust Soc Am 85:691–692Google Scholar
  27. Kalko EKV, Schnitzler HU (1989b) The echolocation and hunting behavior of Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentoni. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:225–238Google Scholar
  28. Kober R, Schnitzler HU (1990) Information in sonar echoes of fluttering insects available for echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 87:882–896Google Scholar
  29. Murray PF, Strickler T (1975) Notes on the structure and function of cheek pouches within the Chiroptera. J Mammal 56:637–676Google Scholar
  30. Neuweiler G (1989) Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats. Trends Ecol Evol 4:160–166Google Scholar
  31. Neuweiler G (1990) Auditory adaptations for prey capture in echolocating bats. Physiol Rev 70:615–641Google Scholar
  32. Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) (1988) Animal sonar processes and performance, Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Novick A, Dale BA (1971) Foraging behavior in fishing bats and their insectivorous relatives. J Mammal 52:817–818Google Scholar
  34. Reeder WG, Norris KS (1954) Distribution, habits and type localities of the fish-eating bat Pizonyx vivesi. J Mammal 35:84–87Google Scholar
  35. Robson SK (1984) Myotis adversus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): Australia's fish-eating bat. Aust Mammal 7:51–52Google Scholar
  36. Roeder KD, Treat AE (1961) The detection and evasion of bats by moths. Am Sci 49:135–148Google Scholar
  37. Roverud RC (1988) A time window for distance information processing in the bats, Noctilio albiventris and Rhinolophus rouxi. In: Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar processes and performance. Plenum, New York, pp 513–517Google Scholar
  38. Schnitzler HU (1987) Echoes of fluttering insects: information for echolocating bats. In: Fenton B, Racey PA, Rayner JMV (eds) Advances in the study of bats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 226–243Google Scholar
  39. Schnitzler HU, Henson OW Jr (1980) Performance of airborne animal sonar systems. I. Microchiroptera. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum, New York, pp 109–181Google Scholar
  40. Schnitzler HU, Kaipf I (1992) Classification of insects by echolocation in the moustache bat, Pteronotus parnelhi. Z Säugetierkde 57 (Supplement):48–49Google Scholar
  41. Schnitzler HU, Menne D, Kober R, Heblich K (1983) The acoustical image of fluttering insects in echolocating bats. In Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology: roots and growing points. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 235–250Google Scholar
  42. Schnitzler HU, Kalko E, Miller L, Surlykke A (1987) The echolocation and hunting behavior of the bat Pipistrellus kuhli. J Comp Physiol 161:267–274Google Scholar
  43. Suthers RA (1965) Acoustic orientation by fish-catching bats. J Exp Zool 158:3119–348Google Scholar
  44. Suthers RA (1967) Comparative echolocation by fishing bats. J Mammal 48:79–87Google Scholar
  45. Suthers RA, Fattu JM (1973) Fishing behavior and acoustic orientation by the bat Noctilio labialis. Anim Behav 21:661–666Google Scholar
  46. Taboada SG (1979) Noctilio leporinus. In: Taboada SG (ed) Las murcielagas de Cuba. Editorial Academia, CubaGoogle Scholar
  47. Tian B (1989) Feinanalyse der Ortungslaute der großen Hufeisennase (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) im Flug and bei der Landung. Diplomarbeit. Faculty of Biology, University of Tübingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenstrup JJ (1984) Auditory sensitivity in the fish-catching bat, Noctilio leporinus. J Comp Physiol A 155:91–101Google Scholar
  49. Wenstrup JJ, Suthers RA (1984) Echolocation of moving targets by the fish-catching bat, Noctilio leporinus. J Comp Physiol A 155:75–89Google Scholar
  50. Withers PC, Timko P (1977) The significance of ground effect to the aerodynamic cost of flight and energetics of the black skimmer (Rhynchops nigra). J Exp Biol 70:13–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
    • 1
  • Elisabeth K. V. Kalko
    • 1
  • Ingrid Kaipf
    • 1
  • Alan D. Grinnell
    • 2
  1. 1.Animal PhysiologyUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Physiology and the Ahmanson Laboratory of Neurobiology UCLASchool of MedicineLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations