Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoskopische oder konventionelle reparation der leistenhernie mit kunststoffnetzen?

Laparoscopic or conventional inguinal hernia repair with mesh?

  • Originalarbeit
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by means of the transabdominal preperitoneal technique (TAPP) was compared with open plug-and-patch-repair (PP) in a prospective study. From September 1992 until July 1994, 86 patients were operated using the TAPP technique; after introduction of PP in August 1994, 105 patients were operated using this technique. From August 1994 until April 1995, 24 more patients wanted the laparoscopic procedure. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex and the distribution of hernia types. Eighty-eight (84%) of the PP patients were operated under local anesthesia, while the others chose general anesthesia. The only intraoperative complication was a bleeding from the epigastric vessel in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative complications were three wound hematomas after TAPP (2.2%) and two wound hematomas and one superficial wound infection after PP (2.4%). All complications healed spontaneously. No detectable statistical difference was noted between the two groups with respect to postoperative pain, the consumption of analgetics, duration of hospitalization and reconvalescence. After a median follow-up of 34 months, two recurrences after TAPP (1.4%) and no recurrences after PP has been detected. Based on our experience we prefer PP for inguinal hernia repair in adults because it affords the same patient comfort as TAPP but is less expensive and can be performed under local anesthesia.

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen einer prospektiven Beobachtungsstudie wurden die Ergebnisse der laparoskopischeu transabdominalen Leistenhernienreparation (TAPP) mit der konventionellen Plug-und-Patch-Reparation (PP) verglichen. Von September 1992 bis Juli 1994 wurden 86 Patienten durch TAPP und nach Einführung der Plug- und Patch-Reparation im August 1994 105 Patienten durch diese Methode operiert. Von August 1994 bis April 1995 wünschten weitere 24 Patienten eine laparoskopische Operation. Die beiden Operationsgruppen waren hinsichtlich Alter, Geschlecht und Befund der Leistenhernie vergleichbar. Von den 105 PP-Patienten wurden 88 in Lokalanästhesie (84%) operiert, die restlichen Patienten wünschten eine Vollnarkose. Intraoperative Komplikationen waren bei TAPP 1 Blutung aus den epigastrischen Gefäßen. Post-operative Komplikationen bestanden aus 2 Wundhämatomen und 1 oberflächlichen Wundinfekt bei PP (2,4%) sowie 3 Wundhämatomen bei TAPP (2,2%), die folgenlos ausheilten. Zwischen beiden Operationsverfahren ergab sich bezüglich der Dauer und Stärke der postoperativen Schmerzen, der benötigten Analgetika sowie der Dauer der stationären Behandlung und der Arbeitsunfähigkeit kein signifikanter Unterschied. Die Rezidivrate beträgt nach TAPP bei einer Nachbeobachtungszeit von 34 Monaten 1,4% (2 Frührezidive) und nach PP bei einer Nachbeobachtungszeit von 15 Monaten 0%. Die konventionelle Reparation PP bietet einen vergleichbaren Behandlungskomfort wie TAPP, ist jedoch in Lokalanästhesie durchführbar und deutlich kostengünstiger. Daher stellt PP unsere Methode der Wahl zur Reparation primärer Leistenhernien beim Erwachsenen dar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein AG (1994) A five-step technique for local anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair. Chirurg 65:388–390

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks DC (1994) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg 129:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  3. Champault G, Benoit J, Lauroy J, Rizk N, Boutelier P (1994) Inguinal hernia in adults. Laparoscopic surgery versus the shouldice method. Controlled randomized study: 181 patients. Preliminary results. Ann Chir 48:1003–1008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cornell RP, Kerlakain GM (1994) Early complications and outcomes of the current technique of transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and a comparison to the traditional approach. Am J Surg 168:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darzi A, Pereshera PA, Quereshi A (1994) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Initial experience in 126 patients. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert AI (1991) Inguinal hernia repair: biomaterials and sutureless repair. Perspect Gen Surg 2:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kux M, Fuchsjäger N, Feichter A (1994) Lichtenstein-Patch versus Shouldice-Technik bei primären Leistenhernien mit hoher Rezidivgefährdung. Chirurg 65:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leibl B, Däubler P, Schwarz J, Ulrich M, Bittner R (1995) Standardisierte laparoskopische Hernioplastik vs. Shouldice Reparation. Ergebnisse einer randomisierten Vergleichsstudie. Chirurg 66:895–898

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG (1986) Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery, including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg 71:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maddern GJ, Rudkin G, Bessell JR, Devitt P, Ponte L (1994) A comparison of laparoscopic and open hernia repair as a day surgical procedure. Surg Endosc 8:1404–1408

    Google Scholar 

  11. Millikan KW, Kosik ML, Doolas A (1994) A prospective comparison of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  12. Payne JH, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, Podoll EF, Lindahl PJ, Balfour J (1994) Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 129:973

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension-free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh-plug” technique. Surgery 14:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Said S, Zieren J, Pichlmaier H (1993) Die laparoskopische Hernienchirurgie. Zentralbi Chir 118:759–766

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schumpelick V, Arlt G (1996) Transinguinale präperitoneale Netzplastik (TIPP) beim Leistenbruch in Lokalanästhesie. Chirurg 67:419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schumpelick V, Töns Ch, Kupcyk-Joeris D (1991) Operation der Leistenhernie. Klassifikation, Verfahrenswahl, Technik und Ergebnisse. Chirurg 62:641–648

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stoker DL, Spiegelhalter DJ, Singh R, Wellwood JM (1994) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomized prospective trial. Lancet 343:1243–1245

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoppa RE (1995) Giant reinforcement of the visceral sac by midline preperitoneal approach in groin. In: Büchler WM, Farthmann EH (eds) Progress in surgery, vol 21. Laparoscopic hernia repair: a new standard? Karger, Basel, pp 59–64

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tschudi J, Wagner M, Klaiber Ch, Brugger JJ, Frei E, Krä-hernbühl L, Interbitzi R, Hüsler J (1995) Controlled multicenter trial laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty versus shouldice herniorrhaphy: preliminary results. In: Büchler WM, Farthmann EH (eds) Progress in surgery, vol 21. Laparaoscopic hernia repair: a new standard? Karger, Basel, pp 165–169

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA (1995) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 169:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson MS, Deans GT, Brough WA (1995) Prospective trial comparing Lichtenstein with laparoscopic tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 82:274–277

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zieren J, Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Müller JM (1996) Die Plug-und-Patch-Reparation zur Versorgung der Leistenhernie des Erwachsenen. Zentralbl Chir (im Druck)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zieren, J., Zieren, H.U., Wenger, F.A. et al. Laparoskopische oder konventionelle reparation der leistenhernie mit kunststoffnetzen?. Langenbecks Arch Chir 381, 289–294 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184051

Key words

Navigation