Skip to main content
Log in

Topical timolol, corneal epithelial permeability and autofluorescence in glaucoma by fluorophotometry

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corneal epithelial permeability and autofluorescence were measured by fluorophotometry in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension to quantify the epithelial function of the cornea and to evaluate its metabolic activity in 24 patients using daily timolol and 11 not using timolol. The findings were compared with those in age-matched healthy controls. Permeability values in patients using timolol were 1.9 times higher than in patients not using timolol and 2.5 times higher than in healthy controls (Mann-Whitney test P<0.001). Values for patients not using timolol did not differ from those for healthy controls (P=0.15). Corneal autofluorescence values in each patient group were higher than in healthy controls (P=0.002). Conclusions: (1) open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension alone does not affect corneal epithelial permeability; (2) daily instillation of timolol causes impairment of the corneal epithelial barrier; (3) open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension are likely to induce an increase of corneal autofluorescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burstein NL (1984) Preservative alteration of corneal permeability in humans and rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:1453–1457

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chance B, Lieberman M (1978) Intrinsic fluorescence emission from the cornea at low temperatures: evidence of mitochondrial signals and their differing redox states in epithelial and endothelial sides. Exp Eye Res 26:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark CV (1989) Autonomic denervation hypersensitivity in the primary glaucomas. Eye 3:349–354

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark CV, Mapstone R (1986) Systemic autonomic neuropathy in open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 64:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Kruijf EJFM, Boot JP, Laterveer L, van Best JA, Ramselaar JAM, Oosterhuis JA (1987) A simple method for determination of corneal epithelial permeability in humans. Curr Eye Res 6:1327–1334

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraunfelder FT (1989) Drugs used primarily in ophthalmology. In: Meyer SM (ed) Drug-induced ocular side effects and drug interactions. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 476–477

    Google Scholar 

  7. Göbbels M, Spitznas M (1991) Effects of artificial tears on corneal epithelial permeability in dry eyes. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229:345–349

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jordan K, Perry SR, McCormack PJ, Downes RN (1988) Cholinergic supersensitivity of the iris in primary open-angle glaucoma. A clinical study. Eye 2:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman HE (1980) Pharmacology of ocular drugs. 1. Timolol maleate. Ophthalmology 87:164–168

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klyce SD, Bonanno JA (1988) Role of the epithelium in corneal hydration. In: Cavanagh HD (ed) The cornea: transactions of the World Congress on the Cornea 3. Raven, New York, pp 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krupin T (1988) Methods of measuring intraocular pressure. In: Loretucci K, Terry D (eds) Manual of glaucoma: diagnosis and management. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuppens EVMJ, Stolwijk TR, van Best JA, de Keizer RJW (1992) Basal tear turnover and topical timolol in glaucoma patients and healthy controls by fluorophotometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:3442–3448

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masters BR (1984) Noninvasive redox fluorometry: how light can be used to monitor alterations of corneal mitochondrial function. Curr Eye Res 3:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masters BR, Falk S, Chance B (1982) In vivo flavoprotein redox measurements of rabbit corneal normoxic transitions. Curr Eye Res 1:623–627

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nork TM, Holly FJ, Hayes J, Wentlandt T, Lamberts DW (1984) Timolol inhibits corneal epithelial wound healing in rabbits and monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1224–1228

    Google Scholar 

  16. O'Brien WJ, Decarlo JD, Stern M, Hyndiuk RA (1982) Effects of Timoptic on corneal reepithelialization. Arch Ophthalmol 100:1331–1333

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pfister RR, Burstein N (1976) The effects of ophthalmic drugs, vehicles, and preservatives on corneal epithelium: a scanning electron microscope study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 15:246–259

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramselaar JAM, Boot JP, van Haeringen NJ, van Best JA, Oosterhuis JA (1988) Corneal epithelial permeability after instillation of ophthalmic solutions containing local anaesthetics and preservatives. Curr Eye Res 7:947–950

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stolwijk TR, van Best JA, Boot JP, Oosterhuis JA (1990) Corneal autofluorescence in diabetic and penetrating keratoplasty patients as measured by fluorophotometry. Exp Eye Res 51:403–409

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stolwijk TR, van Best JA, Oosterhuis JA, SwartW (1992) Corneal autofluorescence: an indicator of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sweeney DF, Vannas A, Holden BA, Tervo T, Telaranta T (1985) Evidence for sympathetic neural influence on human corneal epithelial function. Acta Ophthalmol 63:215–220

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeimer RC, Blair NP, Cunha-Vaz JG (1983) Vitreous fluorophotometry for clinical research: I. Description and evaluation of a new fluorophotometer. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1753–1756

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuppens, E., Stolwijk, T., van Best, J. et al. Topical timolol, corneal epithelial permeability and autofluorescence in glaucoma by fluorophotometry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232, 215–220 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184008

Keywords

Navigation