Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper describes a study of the nature of knowledge structures held by six first year undergraduates in a branch of engineering. Their knowledge structures were defined using the construction of concept maps as an exploration mechanism. A third year undergraduate and a member of staff also provided concept maps from which their knowledge structures could be defined. Comparing the outcome from this study with other studies, a further dimension is apparent. The aspect of confidence was identified that relates to the affective domain. Confidence in a knowledge structure is based on a (valid) personal system of models, experiences and datum ‘values’ which are found in reality. The inclusion of models, experiences and values in a knowledge structure leads to a more comprehensive understanding of how individuals handle problems. The study reported here is deeper than those which have been reported in the referenced literature.

In relation to first year undergraduate engineers it appears: experience is limited; no datum values form a part of their knowledge structures as defined; models are at a simple level. Whether this is appropriate for first year undergraduates is not the issue of this paper, but certainly the difference in knowledge structures between teachers and students may give rise to problems as the two are at different levels and have different included elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AusubelD. P., NovakJ. S., and HanesianH. (1978). Educational Psychology: A cognitive view. (2nd edition), New York: Hold and Rinehart and Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • ChampagneA. B., GunstoneR. F., and KlopferL. E. (1983). Naive knowledge and science learning, Research in Science and Technological Education 1, (2), 173–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, L. O. (1979). Childrens conceptions of price as a function of questions asked. Report from the Institute of Education, University of Goteborg, No. 81. Sweden

  • DriverR. (1981). Pupils alternative framework in science, European Journal of Science Education, 3, (1), 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1973). The representation of conceptual framework in young adolescent science students, Ph.D. thesis. Illinois: University of Illinois, Urbana

  • EntwistleN. J. (1978). Knowledge structures and styles of learning: a summary Pask's recent research. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • EntwistleN. J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching: an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Wiley, Chichaster

    Google Scholar 

  • GilbertJ. K., WattsD. M., and OsborneR. J. (1982). Student conception of ideas in mechanics. Physics Education, 17, (2), 62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • MoreiraM. (1985). Concept mapping: an alternative strategy for evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 10, (2), 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • NovakJ. D., GowinD. J., and JohansenG. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping in knowledge via mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67, 625–645

    Google Scholar 

  • NussbaumJ., and NovakJ. D. (1976) An assessment of children's concepts of the earths utilisation structured interviews, Science Education., 60, (4), 535–550

    Google Scholar 

  • OsborneR. J., BallB. F., GilbertJ. K. (1983). Science teaching and childrens view of the world, European Journal of Science Education, 5, 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • PaskG. (1976). Conversational techniques in the study of practice of education, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • PerryW. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years; a scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • PhillipsJ. L. (1982). Do students think as we do? Progress with Piaget. Improving College and University Teaching, 30, (4), pp. 154–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L., and Hogfors, C. (1984). On science learning, 6th International Conference on Higher Education, University of Lancaster, Lancaster

  • Taylor, E. M. (1984). Understanding concepts in social science: a qualitative evaluation of students on two Open University foundation courses. 6th International Conference on Higher Education. University of Lancaster, Lancaster

  • ViennotL. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics, European Journal of Science Education, 1, 205–221

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fordyce, D. The nature of student learning in engineering. Int J Technol Des Educ 2, 22–40 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183778

Keywords

Navigation