Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biological activity of tissue flaps in the treatment of complicated irradiation wounds

  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the last ten years, 79 patients were treated for 114 chronically contaminated, intractable irradiation wounds using various methods of the modern plastic surgery. Radical excision of the devitalised contaminated tissue has been impracticable in 25 cases due to the risk of life-threatening complications or significant functional loss. Different types of flaps such as cutaneous, fasciocutaneous, musculocutaneous, split muscle, isolated vascularised fascia and greater omentum have been used. Despite the incomplete excision, 84% of wounds healed primarily. The essential factor for good wound healing seems to be the “biologic activity” (BA) of the flap's deep tissue layer that directly contacts the wound bed. BA includes density of the vascular net, ability of neovascularisation, plasticity and specific immunological capacities. It seems to be possible to classify the flaps according to the BA level. Tissue defects in which the chances for radical debridement are poor need the highest BA level in the flap reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calderon W, Chang N, Mathes J (1986) Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:785

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cassidy P (1900) Report of a severe X-ray injury. Med Rec 57:180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis JS (1920) The radical treatment of X-ray burns. Ann Surg 72:224

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eshima I, Mathes SJ, Paty P (1990) Comparison of the intracellular bacterial killing activity of leucocytes in musculocutaneous and random pattern flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:541

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher J, Wood MB, Shaw WW (1987) Experimental comparison of bone revascularisation by musculocutaneous and cutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:81

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gillies HD, McIndoe AH (1935) The role of plastic surgery in burns due to roentgen rays and radium. Ann Surg 101:979

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldsmith HS, Griffith AL, Kupferman A, Castimpoolas N (1984) Lipid angiogenic factor from omentum. JAMA 252:2034

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gorgun B, Ermis MI (1989)Plastic surgery treatment of radiation induced injuries and tumors. Eur J Plast Surg 12:198

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gosalin A, Chang N, Mathes S, Hunt TK, Vasconez L (1990) A study of the relationship between blood flow and bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:1152

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guber S, Rudolph R (1978) The myofibroblast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146:641

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holmstrom H, Johanson B (1972) Local radiation injury and its surgical treatment. Report of 170 cases. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 6:156

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hubner B, Juhn A, Mohler D et al (1990) Time and dose-dependent profile of omental angiogenic lipid factor on bone repair. In: Goldsmith HS (ed) The omentum. Research and clinical application. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 97–108

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huntington TW (1901) Note on X-ray burns and their treatment. Ann Surg 34:808

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khouri RK, Upton J, Shaw WW (1991) Prefabrication of composite free flaps through staged microvascular transfer: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:108

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liebermann-Meffert D, White H (1983) Defense mechanisms. In: Libermann-Meffert D, White H (eds) The greater omentum. Anatomy, physiology pathology, surgery. With a historical survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 90–92

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marino H (1967) Biologic excision: its value in the treatment of radionecrotic lesions. Plast Reconstr Surg 40:180

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller SH, Rudolph R (1990) Healing in the irradiated wound. Clin Plast Surg 17:503

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mathes SJ, Feng LrJ, Hunt TK (1983) Coverage of the infected wound. Ann Surg 198:420

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson DW (1975) Surgical problems in the excision and repair of irradiated tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:41

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russell RC, Graham DR, Feller AM, Zook EG, Mathur A (1988) Experimental evaluation of the antibiotic carrying capacity of a muscle flap into a fibrotic cavity. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:162

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams R (1990) Angiogenesis and greater omentum. In: Goldsmith HS (ed) The omentum. Research and clinical application. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 45–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shilov, B.L., Milanov, N.O. & Libermann-Meffert, D. Biological activity of tissue flaps in the treatment of complicated irradiation wounds. Eur J Plast Surg 18, 46–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183699

Key words

Navigation