Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Free microvascular TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction: the first 50 patients

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skin blood flow in the free TRAM flap has been shown to be superior to that in the pedicled TRAM flap, and in 1990 the free TRAM flap was adopted as the procedure of choice for breast reconstructions. The findings in the first 50 patients whose breasts were reconstructed with free microvascular TRAM flaps are reported. Although 92% of the patients had undergone previous axillary operation and 78% had received radiotherapy, recipient vessels could be found in all axillae. Fortyeight patients had unilateral and two bilateral reconstructions. Reduction or mastopexy was performed on the opposite breast in 50% of the patients. One flap was lost. Skin edge necrosis was found in two patients. Acceptable results with good symmetry or slight asymmetry were achieved in 96%. Seven patients had abdominal laxity due to use of Gore-Tex sutures for closure. Abdominal wall complications ceased once the suture material was changed. The complication rate decreases quickly, as experience increases. Nineteen immediate postoperative or later complications occurred in the first 25 free TRAM flap patients but only 5 in the second 25 patients. The free TRAM flap results in fewer skin problems and is an easier operation for the patient than a pedicled TRAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnez Z, Bajec J, Bardsley A, Scamp T, Webster M (1991) Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 3:470–480

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berrino P, Campora E, Leone S, Santi P (1992) Correction of type II breast deformities following conservative cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:846–853

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen L, Hartrampf C, Bennet G (1993) Successful pregnancies following TRAM flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeMay M, Lejour M, Declety A, Meythiaz A (1991) Late results and current indications of latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions. Br J Plast Surg 44:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickson M, Sharpe D (1987) The complications of tissue expansion in breast reconstructions: a review of 75 cases. Br J Plast Surg 40:629

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elkowitz A, Colen S, Slavin S, Seibert J, Weinstein M, Shaw W (1993) Various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an economic comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elliot F, Eskenazi F, Beegle P, Podres P, Drazan L (1993) Immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction: 128 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2:217

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hartrampf CR, Bennet K (1987) Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg 5:508–519

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kroll S (1991) The early management of flap necrosis in breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:895–901

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kroll S, B. Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 3:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kroll S, Marchi M (1992) Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 6:1045–1051

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lejour M, Dome M (1991) Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominas transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 6:1054–1068

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mühlbauer W, Herndl E, Schmidt A, Henckel-v Donnersmarck G (1991) Temporary AV-shunt for auxiliary microvascular anastomoses of the TRAM or VRAM flap in breast reconstruction — the turbo-charged flap. Eur J Plast Surg 14:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peltoniemi H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Härmä M, Sundell B (1993) Latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 27:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schuster R, Kuske R, Young L, Fineberg B (1992) Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumour control. Plast Reconstr Surg 3:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schusterman M, Kroll S, Weldon M (1992) Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  17. Slavin S, Love S, N Sadowsky N (1992) Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 5:854–865

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tuominen H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Svartling N, Härmä M (1992) Cutaneous blood flow in the TRAM flap. Br J Plast Surg 45:261–269

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tuominen H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Svartling N. Cutaneous blood flow in the free TRAM flap. Br J Plast Surg (in press)

  20. Yamada A, Harii K, Hirabayashi S, Kawashima T, Asato H (1992) Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM flap after breast cancer surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 1:1–6

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb GL, Evans-Gregory RD. Abdominal wall strength, bulging, and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg (in press)

  2. Kroll SS. Necrosis of abdominoplasty and other secondary flaps after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suominen, E., Asko-Seljavaara, S., Tuominen, H. et al. Free microvascular TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction: the first 50 patients. Eur J Plast Surg 18, 1–6 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183689

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183689

Key words

Navigation