Skip to main content
Log in

Depth of penetration of the neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in the human prostate and clinical results of high-dose laser energy in 50 patients

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We evaluated the treatment of the human prostate with the Nd:YAG laser using a Cytocare Prolase II fiber. We utilized this first in 12 patients prior to radical prostatectomy and then appropriately serially sectioned the prostate to measure the depth of penetration. The studies clearly revealed that 60 W of power and 60 s of pulse duration gave the most consistent depth of penetration in the human prostate model. This depth of penetration averaged 2 cm in the glands that were removed. At the same time there was absolutely no evidence of damage to the neurovascular bundle or to the capsule of the prostate using the above-mentioned dosimetry regime. This study was then transferred to our initial experience in treating 50 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy and obstructive voiding symptoms. The first 25 patients were also treated with so-called spot radiation of the prostate, whereas the second 25 patients were treated by total photoirradiation of all visible endoscopic tissue. The results reveal that both groups of patients had a fairly highly satisfactory result as measured objectively with American Urological Association (AUA) symptom scores and uroflow studies. In the latter group (photoirradiation of all visible endoscopic tissue) a significantly higher dose of laser energy was utilized and a smaller failure rate was noted on a long-term basis in patients who subsequently came to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) because of failure of the laser procedure. At the same time that the patients were treated, all 50 patients underwent multiple random needle biopsies of the peripheral zone of the prostate, and at no time was there any evidence of a laser effect in the capsule of the human prostate from a dosimetry of 60 W and 60 s of pulse duration and total photoirradiation of the entire prostate. Very large doses of energy were used, ranging up to 110,000 J per case. It is our impression that the 60-W/60-s protocol will consistently yield the best results in terms of success of laser prostatectomy as measured objectively with uroflow and AUA symptom score as well as providing total safety in term of the absence of damage to the capsule of the prostate despite photoirradiation of all visible viable tissue at high total doses of energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams PH (1977) Prostatism and prostatectomy: the value of urine flow rate measurement in the preoperative assessment for operation. J Urol 117:70–71

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrew HL, Mebust WK, Crockett AT (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148:1549–1557

    Google Scholar 

  3. Costello AJ, Bowsher WG, Bolton DM, Braslis KG, Burt J (1992) Laser ablation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br J Urol 69:603–608

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cristensen MM, Aagaard J, Madsen PO (1990) Transurethral resection versus transurethral incision of the prostate. A prospective randomized study. Urol Clin North Am 17:621–630

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson DE, Levinson AK, Greskovich FJ, Cromeens DM, Ro JY, Costello AJ, Wishno KI (1991) Transurethral laser prostatectomy using a right-angle delivery system. SPIE Proc 1421:36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kabalin JN (1993) Laser prostatectomy performed with a right angle firing neodymium: YAG laser fiber at 40 watts power setting. J Urol 150:96–99

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malloy TR, Wein AJ (1987) Laser treatment of bladder carcinoma and genital condyloma. Urol Clin North Am 14:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malloy TR, Wein AJ, Carpiniello VL (1988) Carcinoma of penis treated with neodymium: YAG laser. Urology 31:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sander S, Beisland HO (1984) Laser in the treatment of localized prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 132:280

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shanberg AM, Chalfin SA, Tansey LA (1984) Neodymium-YAG laser: new treatment for urethral stricture disease. Urology 24:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shanberg AM, Tansey LA, Baghdassarian R (1985) The use of the Nd:YAG in prostatectomy. Poster 331. American Urological Association, Atlanta, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith JA Jr (1986) Treatment of invasive bladder cancer with a neodymium:YAG laser. J Urol 135:55–57

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shanberg, A.M., Sawyer, D.E., Lee, I.S. et al. Depth of penetration of the neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in the human prostate and clinical results of high-dose laser energy in 50 patients. World J Urol 13, 78–82 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183618

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183618

Keywords

Navigation