Skip to main content
Log in

Event history and survival analysis in the social sciences II. Advanced applications and recent developments

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previous paper (Hutchison, 1988) in this journal has provided an introduction to the basic concepts of survival and event history analysis, originally developed in medical research, econometrics and engineering, and argued the case for their wider application in the social sciences. This paper introduces some further complications that the researcher is likely to meet, and offers some guidelines for handling problems that arise in applying such methods to the highly complex social situations involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, M. & Longford, N.T. (1986). “Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies”, Jr. Roy Statist. Soc. A. 14: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.D. (1982). “Introducing a disturbance into logit and probit regression models”, Mimeo. Cornell University.

  • Armitage, P. (1985). “Contribution to discussion of paper by Clayton & Cuzick”, Jr. Roy Statist. Soc A 148: 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. & Nesselroade, J.R. (1979). “History and rationale of longitudinal research”, in Nesselroade, J.R. & Baltes, P. (eds.) Longitudinal Research in The Study of Behaviour and Development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R.E. & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. New York: Holt Rinehart Winsten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, N.R. (1978). “A survival model for a wood preservative trial”, Biometrics 34: 673–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D.G. (1978). “A model for association in bivariate life-tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence”, Biometrika 65: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D.G. & Cuzick, J. (1985). “Multivariate generalisations of the proportional hazards model”, Jr. Roy Statist. Soc A 148: 82–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D.G. (1986) “‘Errors in variables’ models in epidemiology”, paper delivered to Medical Section, Roval Statistical Society, 25th February 1986.

  • Cox, D.R. (1972). “Regression models and life tables”, Jr. Roy Statist. Soc B34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of Survival Data London: Chapman-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozick, J. (1982). “Rank tests for association with right censored data”, Biometrika 69: 304–364.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David, H.A. & Moeschberger, M.L. (1978). The Theory of Competing Risks. London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R.B., Pickles, A. & Crouchley, R. (1982). “Event history testing”, Sociological Methods and Research 285–302.

  • Davies, R.B. (1983). “Duration dependence: a re-evaluation of the competing risk approach”, Environment and Planning A 15: 1057–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R.B. & Pickles, A. (1985). “Longitudinal vs. cross-sectional methods for behavioural research: a first round knockout”, Environment & Planning A 17: 1315–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. & Rubin, D.B. (1977). “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM Algorithm” Jr. Roy Statist. Soc. B. 39: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdney, L., Skuse, D., Rutter, M., Quinton, D. & Mrazek, D. (1985). “The nature and qualities of parenting provided by women raised in institutions”, Jr. Child Psychol. Psychiatr 26: 599–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbers, C. & Ridder, G. (1982). “True and spurious duration dependence: the identifiability of the proportional hazards model”, Rev. Econ. Studies 49: 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farewell, V.T. & Cox, D.R. (19??). “A note on multiple time scales in life testing”, Appl Statist 28: 73–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, C.J. & Heckman, J. (1982). “New Methods for analysing individual event histories”, Sociological Methodology 1982: 99–144.

  • Fuller, W. & Hidiroglou, M. (1978). “Regression estimation after correcting for attenuation”, Jr. Amer Statist. Ass. 73: 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gail, M.H. (1975). “A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analysis”, Biometrika 31: 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R.B. (1978), “The relationship between timing of moves and choice of destination in stochastic models of migration”, Environment and Planning A 10: 667–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1986). “Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalised least squares”, Biometrika 73: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1961). “Statistical methods for the mover-stayer model”, Jr. Amer. Statist. Ass. 56: 841–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. & Borjas, G. (1980). “Does unemployment cause future unemployment?”, Economica 47: 247–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. & Willis (1977). “A beta logistic model for the analysis of sequential labour force participation by married women”, Jr. Pol. Econ. 85: 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. & Singer, B. (1982). “The identification problem in econometric models for duration data”, in W. Hildenbrand (ed.), Advances in Econometrics: Proceedings of World Meeting of the Econometric Society 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. & Singer, B. (1984). “Econometric duration analysis”, Jr. Econometric 24: 63–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidiroglou, M.A., Fuller, W.A. & Hickman, R.D. (1979), SUPER CARP. Mimeo. Statistical Laboratory. Iowa State University.

  • Holt, T.D. & Prentice, R.L. (1974). “Survival analyses in twin studies and matched pair experiments”, Biometrika 61: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, D. (1980). “Statistical appendix”, in J. Steedman, Progress in Secondary Schools, National Children's Bureau, 8 Wakley Street, London, EC1V 7QE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, D. (1988) “Event history and survival analysis in the social sciences, part I”, Quality & Quantity 22: 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G. (1979). “Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal-development investigation”, in J.N. Nesselroade and P.B. Baltes (eds.), Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behaviour and Development Academic Press.

  • Kay, R. (1984). “Multistate survival analysis: an application in breast cancer”, paper delivered to Royal Statistical Society Medical Section, 28th Feb. 1984.

  • Lagakos, S.W. & Williams, J.S. (1978). “Models for censored survival analysis: a cone class of variable-sum models”, Biometrika 65: 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J.R. (1984). “Analysing relations in dyads: problems, models and inter-organisational research”, Sociological Methods and Research 13: 45–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A. (1983). Generalised Linear Models, London and New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, R. (1968). “A stochastic model of social mobility”, Amer. Soc. Rev. 23: 712–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeschberger, M.L. (1974). “Life tests under dependent competing causes of failure” Technometrics 16: 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadas, A. (1970) “On estimating the distribution of a random vector when only the smallest co-ordinate is visible”, Technometrics 13: 923–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadas, A. (1971). “The distribution of the identified minimum identifies the distribution of the pair”, Technometrics, 14: 201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, D. (1982). “A model for association in bivariate survival data”, Jr. Roy Statist. Soc. B 44: 414–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, D.A., Stuart, W.H. & Kopecky, K.J. (1979), “Distribution free regression analysis of grouped survival data”, Biometrics 34: 785–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, R.L., Kalbfleisch, J.D., Peterson, A. V., Flournoy, N., Farewell, V.T. & Breslow, N.E. (1978). “The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks”, Biometrics 34: 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, R.L. (1982). “Covariate measurement errors and parameter estimation in a failure time regression model”, Biometrika 69: 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. & Spilerman, S. (1976). “The representation of social processes by Markov Models”, Amer. Jr. Sociol. 82: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS-Inc. (1984). “USERPROC LISREL: Using LISREL VI with SPSSX”, SPSS Inc.

  • Thom, R. (1975). Structural Stability and Morphogenesis (translated by D.H. Fowler). Reading, Mass.: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, N.B. (1980). Invoking RATE. Mannheim: ZUMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, N.B. & Hannan, M.T. (1984). Social Dynamics: Models and Methods Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J., White, J.K. & Fuller, W.A. (1974). “An error-in-variables analysis of managerial rold performance”, Jr. Amer. Statist. Ass. 69: 886–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, R.W.M. (1974). “Quasi — likelihood functions, generalised linear models and the Gauss — Newton method”, Biometrika 61: 439–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolson, R.F. & Lagenbruch, P.A. (1980). “Rank tests for censored matched pairs”, Biometrika 67: 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N. (1980). “An approach to the modeling of shop choice patterns: an exploratory analysis of purchasing patterns in a British City”, in D.T. Herbert and R.J. Johnston (eds). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.C. (1982). “Rank tests for independence based on partially right censored pairs”, Communications in Statistics 11: 2207–2216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchison, D. Event history and survival analysis in the social sciences II. Advanced applications and recent developments. Qual Quant 22, 255–278 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183540

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183540

Keywords

Navigation