Skip to main content
Log in

The discrete sequential analysis of dynamic international behavior

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reexamines the dynamic patterns of US-Soviet foreign policy behavior using recently developed methods for the sequential analysis of categorical data. The methods proposed here have several advantages over conventional regression based modeling procedures. First, assumptions about the role of time in foreign policy behavior and decisionmaking processes are more realistic in that time is represented as an ordinal sequence on human experience. Second, these methods better approximate the causal structure of actionreaction theories by delineating the temporal order of stimulus and response, and by focusing attention on individual behaviors rather than aggregate behavioral constructs. Third, the probabilistic nature of action-reaction hypotheses are made explicit through the use of logit transformed conditional probabilities. Finally, by accommodating model specifications that are virtually isomorphic to traditional action-reaction modeling efforts, these methods retain the flexibility and interpretability of standard regression approaches. Application of these methods to US-Soviet interaction revealed a marked asymmetry in the superpowers' responsiveness to one another's foreign policy behavior during the 1966–1978 period. According to these analyses, Soviet behavior is more clearly a function of its own prior activities than a response to the United States whereas American behavior is far more dependent on prior Soviet actions than its on own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, Pierre (1983). Crisis Bargaining and the Arms Race: A Theoretical Model. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Graham T. & Morton H. Halperin (1972). “Bureaucratic politics: a paradigm and some policy implications”, World Politics 24 (supplement): 40–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Paul D. & Jeffrey K. Liker (1982). “Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction”, Psychological Bulletin 91: 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Richard K. (1982). The Political Economy of War and Peace. New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, Roger. (1978). “Untangling streams of behavior: sequential analysis of observational data”, in Gene P. Sackett (ed.), Observing Behavior, Vol. II, Data Collection and Analysis Methods. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Yvonne M.M., Stephen F. Feinberg & Paul W. Holland (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, Davis B. (1982). “Uncoordinated Giants”, in Charles W. Kegley and Pat McGowan (eds), Foreign Policy USA/USSR. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. (1959). “National Images and International Systems”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 3: 120–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Jere (1976). “What's the question to that answer? Measures and marginals in crosstabulation”, American Journal of Political Science 20: 781–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, William J. (1986). “Reciprocity in United States-Soviet relations: multiple symmetry or issue linkage?”, American Journal of Political Science 30: 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, William J. (1983). “Measuring Interstate Affect”, American Journal of Political Science 27: 828–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton, B. (1984). Models of Category Counts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William & Modigliani, A. (1971). Untangling the Cold War: A Strategy for Testing Rival Theories. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, John M. (1979). Martial Interaction: Experimental Investigations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A. & John E. Jackson (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, Charles F. (1982). “Foreign policy”, in Stuart S. Nagel (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Policy Sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, P. Terrence, Dina A. Zinnes & J. David Singer (eds) (1981). Cumulation in Internation Relations Research. Monograph Series in World Affairs, v. 18. Denver: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Llewellyn D. (1983). “A comparative study of the WEIS and COPDAB data sets”, International Studies Quarterly 27: 149–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegley, Charles W., Jr. (1976). “Selective attention: a general characteristic of the interactive behavior of nations”, International Interactions 2: 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegley, Charles W., Jr. & Richard A. Skinner (1975). “The case-for-analysis problem”, in J.N. Rosenau (ed.), In Search of Global Patterns. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng, R.L. & Goodsell, R.A. (1975). “Behavioral indicators of war proneness in bilateral conflicts”. in P.J. McGowan (ed.), Sage International Yearbook of Foreign Policy Studies, Vol. II. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Warren R. (1978). “Prior behavior as an explanation of foreign policy”, pp. 161–172 in Maurice A. East, Stephen A. Salmore & Charles F. Hermann (eds), Why Nations Act. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, Dean G. (1969). “Stability and sudden change in interpersonal and international affairs”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 13: 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Lewis F. (1960). Arms and Insecurity. Pittsburgh: Boxwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Neil R., Charles W. Kegley, Jr. & Anne C. Agnew (1981). “Symmetry and reciprocity as characteristics of dyadic foreign policy behavior”, Social Science Quarterly 62: 128–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, Gene P. (1979). “The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research”, in J.D. Osofsky (ed.), Handbook of Infant Development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, Gene P. (1980). “Lag sequential analysis as a data reduction technique in social interaction research”, in Douglas B. Sawin, Raymond C. Hawkins, Lorraine Olszewski Walker & Joy Hinson Penticuff (eds), Exceptional Infant, Vol. 4, Psychosocial Risks in Infant Environment Transactions. New York: Brunner, Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, Philip A. (1984). “Artificial intelligence and international crisis: the application of pattern recognition to the analysis of event sequences”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

  • Tanter, Raymond (1972). “International system and foreign policy approaches: implications for conflict modelling and management”, World Politics 24 (supplement): 7–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, William R. & David P. Rapkin (1982). “Conflict, inertia, and reciprocity: coping with the Western bloc”, in C.W. Kegley Jr, & P. McGowan (eds), Foreign Policy: USA/USSR. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triska, Jan A. & David D. Finley (1965). “Soviet-American relations: a multiple symmetry model”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 9: 37–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, Bruce E. & Gayla Margolin (1982). “Nonparametric strategies to test the independence of behavioral states in sequential data”, Psychological Bulletin 92: 755–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Michael Don (1981). “Seasonality, reaction, expectation, adaptation, and memory in cooperative and conflictual policy behavior: a research note”, International Interactions 8: 229–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Michael Don (1982). “Cooperation and conflict in foreign policy behavior”, International Studies Quarterly 26: 87–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Herbert F. (1974). “Models of statistical relationship”, American Political Science Review 68: 1638–1655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnes, Dina A. (1983). “An event model of conflict interaction”, in Dina A. Zinnes (ed.), Conflict Processes and the Breakdown of International Systems. Monograph Series in World Affairs, v. 20. Denver: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, W.J. The discrete sequential analysis of dynamic international behavior. Qual Quant 22, 239–254 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183539

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183539

Keywords

Navigation