Skip to main content
Log in

Crowding out, deficits, and interest rates: Reply

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Spector and Van Cott argue that ‘... statistical significance of the relationship between interest rates and the deficit is irrelevant for the question of crowding out.’ This Reply in turn argues that studies of the impact of deficits upon interest rates may be very useful in determining whether (and perhaps how) crowding out occurs and that additional empirical analysis involving the interest sensitivity of commodity demand is necessary to then quantify the actual degree of crowding out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cebula, R.J. (1987). Federal deficits and the real rate of interest in the United States: A note. Public Choice 53 (January): 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, T.M. (1986). The cyclically adjusted federal budget and federal debt: Revised and updated estimates. Survey of Current Business 66 (March): 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebula, R.J. Crowding out, deficits, and interest rates: Reply. Public Choice 58, 95–97 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183333

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183333

Keywords

Navigation