Skip to main content
Log in

Televising legislatures: Some thoughts on whether politicians are search goods

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The evidence that televising legislative sessions helps politicians from homogeneous districts, where everyone agrees with his positions, but hurts politicians from heterogeneous districts, does not differentiate between whether politicians are search or experience goods. While evidence does exist that politicians are search goods (e.g., Lott, 1987b), it relies on the presence of the last period problem. If the conclusion that politicians are search goods is correct, it has important implications, because it contradicts the commonly held belief that it is the threat of re-election that prevents politicians from behaving opportunistically. It also indicates that there are fundamental differences between firm and political brand names.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amacher, R.C., and Boyes, W.J. (1978). Cycles in Senatorial voting behavior: Implications for the optimal frequency of elections, Public Choice 33 (3): 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (Spring 1973). Control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice 14: 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W.M., and Golf, B.L. (October 1986). Televising legislatures: An economic analysis. Journal of Law and Economics 24 (2): 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W., and Munger, M. (forthcoming). The rationality of ideology. Journal of Law and Economics.

  • Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50 (1): 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J.P., and Zupan, M. (June 1984). Capture and ideology in economic theory of politics. American Economic Review 74 (3): 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., and Leffler, K.B. (August 1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 615–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B., and Rubin, P.H. (October 1979). Self-interest, ideology and logrolling in congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 22 (2): 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D.N., and Lentz, B.F. (1985). Favorite sons: Intergenerational wealth transfers among politicians. Economic Inquiry 23 (3): 395–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1986). Brand names and barriers to entry in political markets. Public Choice 51 (1): 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1987a). The effect of nontransferable property rights on the efficiency of political property rights: Some evidence. Journal of Public Economics 32 (2): 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1987b). Political cheating. Public Choice 52 (2): 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1987c). Attendance rates, political shirking, and the effect of post-elective office employment. Stanford: Hoover Institution Working Paper #P-86–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R., and Reed, W.R. (1987). Shirking and sorting in a political market with finite-lived politicians. Stanford: Hoover Institution Working Paper E-87–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (August 1976). Political information. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (August 1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (April 1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (1): 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. (August 1976). Comment on political information. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. (January 1980). A theory of self-enforcing agreements. Journal of Business 22 (1): 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Mark Crain and an anonymous referee from this journal for their helpful comments. This paper was accepted while Lott was at the Hoover Institution and Montana State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fremling, G.M., Lott, J.R. Televising legislatures: Some thoughts on whether politicians are search goods. Public Choice 58, 73–78 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183329

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183329

Keywords

Navigation