References
Baumol, W.J., and Stewart, M. (1971). On the behavioral theory of the firm. In R. Marris and A. Wood (Eds.), The corporate economy: Growth, competition, and innovation potential. New York: Macmillan.
Borcherding, T. (1984). Toward a positive theory of public sector supply arrangements. In R. Prichard and M. Tribilcock (Eds.), Crown corporations in Canada: The calculus of instrument choice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Burkhead, J. (1956). Governmental Budgeting. New York: Wiley.
Chapman, J. (1982). Fiscal stress and budgetary activity. Public Budgeting and Finance 2 (2): 7.
Cothran, D. (1986). Some sources of ‘budgetary unconontrollability’: The interaction of auto-matic funding and program flexibility. Public Budgeting and Finance. 6 (2): 45.
Crecine, J.P. (1969). Governmental problem solving. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Downs, G., and Larkey, P.D. (1979). Theorizing about public expenditure decision making: (As) if wishes were horses. Policy Sciences 11:143.
Eisner, R., and Pieper, P. (1985). How to make sense of the deficit. The Public Interest 78 (Winter): 101.
Fischer, G.W. and Kamlet, M.S. (1984). Explaining presidential priorities: The competing aspiration levels of macrobudgetary decision making. American Political Science Review 78 (2): 356.
Hirschleifer, J. (1970). Investment, interest and capital. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory. Econometrica 47: 263.
Kotlikoff, L.J. (1986). Deficit delusion. The Public Interest 84 (Summer): 53.
Langbein, L. (1987). Comment. Delivered at the Public Choice Society Meeting, Doubletree Hotel, Tucson AZ, 27 March.
Larkey, P.D. (1979). Evaluating Public programs: The effect of general revenue sharing on municipalities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Larkey, P.D., and Smith, R.A. (1985). Bias in the formulation of local government budget problems. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans Hilton, 29 August–1 September.
LeLoup, L. (1978). Discretion in national budgeting: Controlling the controllables. Policy Analysis 4 (Fall): 455.
Mitnick, B. (1975). The theory of agency. Public Choice 24 (Winter): 27.
Pantaleoni, M. (1883). Contribution to the theory of the distribution of public expenditure. In R. Musgrave and A. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance, New York: Macmillan, 1958.
Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (April): 181.
Thompson, F., and Jones, L.R. (1986). Controllership in the public sector. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5 (3): 547.
Thompson, F., and Williams, R. (1979). A horse race around a mobiuc strip: A review and a test of utility-maximizing and organizational-process models of public expenditure decisions. Policy Sciences 11: 119.
Tullock, G. (1965). Politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
Wildavsky, A. (1968). Budgeting as a political process. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 2: 192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this essay was delivered at the Public Choice Society Meeting, Tucson AZ, 27–29 March 1987. Our thanks to Laura Langbein, Steve Maser, Eugenia Froedge-Toma, and Gordon Tullock for helpful comments. Special thanks to George Racette.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choate, G.M., Thompson, F. Budget makers as agents: A preliminar investigation of discretionary behavior under state-contingent rewards. Public Choice 58, 3–20 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183325
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183325