Skip to main content
Log in

CHESS classification of bladder-outflow obstruction

A consequence in the discussion of current concepts

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present discussion on the natural history, growth rate, pathophysiology, morbidity, and possible treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) reinforces the need to objectify mechanical BPH-induced obstruction with pressure-flow study. Different methods for the quantification of BPH-induced obstruction exist and the grade of simplification depends on their working mechanism. To review the limitations of the current concepts, 118 BPH patients were selected for computerized pressure-flow data analysis according to quadratic passive urethral resistance relation (PURR) function. The CHESS classification differs from all other concepts due to its two-dimensional character and was developed as a result of the following way of thinking: (1) the whole individual pressure-flow plot is the most accurate basis for further analysis; (2) PURR as the true low-pressure flank of the individual plot is the most favorable definition for mechanical obstruction; (3) PURR quantification requires at least two parameters, footpoint and curvature/slope, with regard to the documented missing significant correlation of both; and (4) a two-parameter-based classification is two-dimensional (CHESS classification).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Griffiths DJ (1979) The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurement and from residual urine. Br J Urol 51:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaivas JG (1983) Differential diagnosis. In: Hinman F Jr (ed) Benign prostatic hypertrophy, Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 747–762

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gleason DM, Lattimer JK (1962) The pressure flow study: a method of measuring bladder neck resistance. J Urol 87:844–852

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths DJ (1980) Urodynamics. The mechanics and hydrodynamics of the lower urinary tract. (Medical physics handbooks series, vol 4) Adam Hilger, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths D, Mastrigt R van, Bosch R (1989) Quantification of urethral resistance and bladder function during voiding, with special reference to the effects of prostate size reduction on urethral obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Neurourol Urodyn 8:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  6. Höfner K, Kramer AEJL, Tan HK, Grünewald V, Jonas U (1993) Advances in urodynamics. Eur Urol Update Ser 2:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Höfner K, Tan HK, Kramer AEJL, Kuczyk M, Dalwig-Nolda D, Jonas U (1993) Changes in obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) after transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Neurourol Urodyn 12:376–377

    Google Scholar 

  8. Höfner K, Kramer AEJL, Tan HK, Grünewald V, Jonas U (1993) Chess clasification of outflow obstruction based on pressure flow analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 12:414–415

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen KM-E (1989) Clinical evaluation of routine urodynamic investigations in prostatism. Neurourol Urodyn 8:545–578

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kranse R, Mastrigt R van (1991) Fitting orthogonal polynomials to the lowest part of a pressure flow plot. Neurourol Urodyn 10:290–291

    Google Scholar 

  11. McGuire EJ (1992) The role of urodynamic investigation in the assessment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Urol 148:1133–1136

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rollema HJ, Mastrigt R van (1991) Objective analysis of prostatism: a clinical appraisal of the computer program CLIM. Neurourol Urodyn 10:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schäfer W (1983) The contribution of the bladder outlet to the relation between pressure and flow rate during micturition. In: Hinman F Jr (ed) B enign prostatic hypertrophy. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 470–496

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schäfer W (1985) Urethral resistance? Urodynamic concepts of physiological and pathological bladder outlet function during voiding. Neurourol Urodyn 4:161–201

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schäfer W (1990) Basic principles and clinical application of advanced analysis of bladder voiding function. Urol Clin North Am 17:553–566

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schäfer W (1992) Comparison of simple concepts of pressure flow analysis: URA versus linear PURR and p/Q diagram. Neurourol Urodyn 11:397–398

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schäfer W, Rübben H, Noppeney R, Deutz FJ (1989) Obstructed and unobstructed “prostatic obstruction”: A plea for objectivation of bladder outflow obstruction by urodynamics. World J Urol 6:198–203

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tubaro A, Ogden C, Rosette J de la, Höfner K, Trucchi A, Miano L, Carter S, Jonas U, Debruyne F (1994) The prediction of clinical outcome for thermotherapy by pressure-flow study. Results of a European multicenter study. J Urol 151:417A

  19. Spångberg A, Teriö H, Engberg A, Ask P (1989) Quantification of urethral function based on Griffiths' model of flow through elastic tubes. Neurourol Urodyn 8:29–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Höfner, K., Kramer, A.E.J.L., Tan, H.K. et al. CHESS classification of bladder-outflow obstruction. World J Urol 13, 59–64 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182667

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182667

Keywords

Navigation