Skip to main content
Log in

Detubularized right colonic reservoir with intussuscepted ileal nipple valve or stapled ileal (“Lundiana”) outlet

Clinical and urodynamic results in a prospective randomized study

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a prospective randomized study, patients undergoing cystectomy and continent urinary diversion by means of a detubularized right colonic reservoir were randomized to one of two types of outlet: either an intussuscepted ileal nipple value (n=15) or a stapled ileal (“Lundiana”) outlet (n=15). There were no early complications from the reconstruction. Subsequently, one ileal nipple outlet required revision because of progressive catheterization difficulties. In the Lundiana group, perforation of the reservoir occurred in one case and a narrow stomal opening was revised in local anesthesia in two cases. Urodynamic assessment revealed similar pressures at rest for the two outlets. At stress (concomitant with reservoir contraction), there was a distinct increase in outlet pressure in the nipple valves, but this was rarely encountered in the Lundiana group. Questionnaires showed episodes of urinary leakage to be more common in the Lundiana group, whereas the reverse applied to catheterization difficulties. In both groups, however, the great majority of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the function of the urinary tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abol-Enein H, El-Baz M, Ghoneim MA (1993) Optimization of ureterointestinal anastomosis in urinary diversion: an experimental study in dogs. I. Evaluation of the Le Duc technique. Urol Res 31:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bejany DE, Politano VA (1988) Stapled and nonstapled tapered distal ileum for construction of a continent colonic reservoir. J Urol 140:491–494

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clair SR, Hixon CJ, Ritchey ML (1992) Enterocystoplasty and reflux nephropathy in the canine model. J Urol 148:728–732

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen S, Harris CD, Levitan R (1968) Manometric characteristics of the human ileocecal junctional zone. Gastroenterology 54:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colding-Jørgensen M, Steven KA (1993) A model of the mechanics of smooth muscle reservoirs applied to the intestinal bladder. Neurourol Urodyn 12:59–79

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidsson T, Barker SB, Månsson W (1992) Tapering of intussuscepted ileal nipple valve or ileocecal valve to correct secondary incontinence in patients with urinary reservoir. J Urol 147:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidsson T, Poulsen AL, Hedlund H, Steven K, Månsson W (1992). A comparative urodynamic study of the ileal and colonic neobladder. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl] 142:143

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davidsson T, Åkerlund S, Forsell-Aronsson E, Kock NG, Månsson W (1994) Absorption characteristics of 22Na and 36Cl in continent reservoirs for urine: a comparative study of ileal and colonic reservoirs. J Urol 151:335–337

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidsson T, Lindergård B, Månsson W (1995) Long-term metabolic and nutritional effects of urinary diversion. Urology 46:804–809

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esen T, Jünemann K-P, Berle B, Persson-Jünemann Ch, Alken P (1994) Kompetenz verschiedener Ventilmechanismen am abführenden Darmschenkel bei kontinentem Blasenersatz: Eine hydrodynamische Vergleichsstudie am Kadaverdarmmodell. Akt Urol 25:338–343

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldwasser B, Månsson W, Davidsson T, Hedlund H, Brooks M, Ramon J (1991) Cystourethrometric findings in patients with detubularized right colonic segment for bladder replacement. J Urol 145:538–541

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helal M (1993) Direct nontunneled ureterocolonic reimplantation in association with continent reservoirs. J Urol 150:835–837

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hinman F Jr (1990) Functional classification of conduits for continent diversion. J Urol 144:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kleinhans B, Köhl U, Weingärtner K, Riedmiller H (1994) Ureterointestinal stenosis following continent urinary diversion — treatment by endourology or open surgery? XIth Congress of the European Association of Urology 1994, Abstract Book, p 172

  15. Kock NG (1987) The development of the continent ileal reservoir (Kock Pouch) and application in patients requiring urinary diversion. In: King LR, Stone AR, Webster GD (eds) Bladder Reconstruction and Continent Urinary Diversion. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, Chicago, pp 269–290

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kock NG, Nilson AE, Nilsson LO, Norlén LJ, Philipson BM (1982) Urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: clinical results in 12 patients. J Urol 128:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koff SA, Cirulli C, Wise H (1989) Clinical and urodynamic features of a new intestinal urinary sphincter for continent urinary diversion. J Urol 142:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kristiansson P, Månsson W, Tyger J (1991) Perforation of continent caecal reservoir for urine twice in one patient. Scand J Urol Nephrol 25:279–281

    Google Scholar 

  19. Le Duc A (1992) Mucosal groove antireflux uretero-ileal implantation. In: Hohenfellner R, Wammack R (eds) Societé Internationale d'Urologie Reports. Continent urinary diversion. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 102–109

    Google Scholar 

  20. Le Duc A, Camey M, Teillac P (1987) An original antireflux ureteroileal implantation technique: long-term followup. J Urol 137:1156–1158

    Google Scholar 

  21. Månsson W, Ahlgren G, White T (1989) Glomerular filtration rate up to 10 years after urinary diversion of different types. A comparative study of ileal and colonic conduit, refluxing and antirefluxing ureteral anastomosis and continent caecal reservoir. Scand J Urol Nephrol 23:195–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Månsson W, Davidsson T, Colleen S (1990) The detubularized right colonic segment as urinary reservoir: evolution of technique for continent diversion. J Urol 144:1359–1361

    Google Scholar 

  23. Månsson W, Davidsson T, Kristjansson A, Wullt B (1994) Continent urinary diversion. Eur Urol Update Ser 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rowland RG (1995) Complications of continent cutaneous reservoirs and neobladders — series using contemporary techniques. Am Urol Assoc Update Ser (in press)

  25. Rowland RG, Mitchell ME, Bihrle R (1985) The cecoileal continent urinary reservoir. World J Urol 3:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shaaban AA, Gaballah MA, El-Diasty T, Ghoneim MA (1992) Urethral controlled bladder substitution: a comparison between the intussuscepted nipple valve and the technique of Le Duc as antireflux procedure. J Urol 148:1156–1161

    Google Scholar 

  27. Skinner DG (1992) Intussuscepted ileal nipple valve-development and present status. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl] 142:63–65

    Google Scholar 

  28. Skinner DG, Lieskovsky G, Boyd SD (1989) Continent urinary diversion. J Urol 141:1323–1327

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stenzl A, Klutke CG, Golomb J, Raz S (1990) Tapered intraluminal versus imbricated extraluminal valve: comparison of two continence mechanisms for urinary diversion. J Urol 143:607–661

    Google Scholar 

  30. Studer UE (1991) Ileal bladder substitute: antireflux nipple or afferent tubular segment. Eur Urol 20:315–326

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidsson, T., Hedlund, H. & Månsson, W. Detubularized right colonic reservoir with intussuscepted ileal nipple valve or stapled ileal (“Lundiana”) outlet. World J Urol 14, 78–84 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182562

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182562

Keywords

Navigation