Enema reduction of intussusception with a small dose of iopamidol may have advantages over barium

Abstract

Barium enema (B-enema) has been the standard method for hydrostatic reduction of intussusception, although recently air enema has been used due to the lower risk when perforation occurs. Recently, we have administered a small dose of iopamidol during enema reduction (I-enema) in children with intussusception. From November 1989 to December 1993, we treated 50 children with intussusception at Kiyama Hospital. Barium was used in the first half of the period, and iopamidol in the second half. Reduction was successful in 22 of 24 patients with barium (92%) and 23 of 26 with iopamidol (88%); 25 children had the ileocolic type and 25 the ileoileocolic (-cecal) type of intussusception. Operations were carried out in 3 patients from each group. I-enema avoids some of the drawbacks of barium and air enemas. It is a new method of enema reduction, as a contrast medium is injected first. It is possible to obtain a good image of the advanced portion with a small dose of contrast medium, which is important for treatment. For institutions performing B-enemas, I-enemas can be performed easily with the same equipment and technique. It causes less contamination upon leakage than a B-enema, and also has less influence on the intestinal membrane with very few risks if perforation occurs. Better images are obtained than with air. A large dose of contrast medium is not needed, thereby reducing medical expenses to a minimum. Iopamidol can be used safely for enema reduction of intussusception with an expected high success rate.