Skip to main content
Log in

A “clash of ideas” or an exercise in scholastic ‘misunderstanding’?: A response to Button's response

  • Comments
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Auer, P (1990). Rhythm in telephone closings. Human Studies 13: 361–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G. (1990a). A clash of ideas: A response to Auer. Human Studies 13: 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G. (1990b). On varieties of closings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence, 93–148. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. and French, J.W. (1981). Telephone goodbyes. Language in Society 10: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, G.J., Garfinkel, H., Heap, J., O'Neill, J., Psathas, G., Rose, E., Tiryakian, E., Wieder, L.D., and Wagner, H.R. (1977). When is phenomenology sociological? (panel discussion). In M. Korenbaum (Ed.), The annuals of the phenomenological sociology, Vol. II, 1–40. Dayton.

  • McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D.C. and Blum, A.F. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E.A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation, 70–85. Avon: Multilingual Matters.

  • Schegloff, E.A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7:289–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempesta, I. (1992). Mezzi linguistici e strategie converzionali in aperture di telefonate. In A. Sobrero, I. Tempesta, M. Panese and S. Proto, Dalla pratica alla pragmatica. Milano: Congedo Galatina.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auer, P. A “clash of ideas” or an exercise in scholastic ‘misunderstanding’?: A response to Button's response. Hum Stud 15, 291–297 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182110

Keywords

Navigation