Skip to main content
Log in

Reading Goffman's framing as provocation of a discipline

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Berkeley, G. (1710/1957). The principles of human knowledge. New York: Liberal Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. E. (1982). Appearance and reality in politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1973–74). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (1975). Review of Frame analysis. Contemporary Sociology 4: 599–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. and Keller, C. M. (1981). Frame analysis reconsidered. Contemporary Sociology 10: 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1972/1981). Dissemination. Trans. B. Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). La vérité en peinture. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, R. (1984). Rhetoric in sociology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the other. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. (1975). Review of Frame analysis. Contemporary Sociology 4: 603–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1980). Blurred genres: The refiguration of social thought. The American Scholar 49: 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society 4: 301–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). A reply to Denzin and Keller. Contemporary Sociology 10: 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonos, G. (1977). “Situation” versus “frame.” American Sociological Review 42: 854–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1984). Of mind and other matters. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972/1983). Walter Benjamin: Consciousness-raising or rescuing critique. In Philosophical political profiles. Trans. F. G. Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg, L. (1989). Social science and the challenge of relativism. Vol. I. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg, L. (1991). The problem of micro-macro linkage: Rethinking questions of the individual, social structure, and autonomy of action. Current Perspectives in Social Theory 11: 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1977). Phenomenology of spirit. 5th edition, ed. J. Hofmeister, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. (1982). The social destruction of reality. In M. Hollis and S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1976). On Goffman's frame analysis. Theory and Society 3: 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1954). A conceptual introduction to latent structure analysis. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. K. (1977). Review of Frame analysis. American Journal of Sociology 82: 1361–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, J. (1981). A preface to frame analysis. Human Studies 4: 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehberg, K.-S. (1985). Anti-sociology. History of Sociology 5: 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1968/1971). The thinking of thoughts: what is le Penseur doing? In Collected Papers. Vol. 2. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1975). Beginnings. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1974). Four Pragmatists. New York: Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1953/1962). Common sense and scientific interpretations of human action. In Collected papers. Vol. 1, ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1954/1962). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In Collected papers. Vol. 1, ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1905/1977). The Problem of the philosophy of history. 2nd edition, ed. and trans. G. Oakes. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloterdijk, P. (1983/1987). Critique of cynical reason. Trans. M. Eldred. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Peter Manning anf two anonymous readers for their encouraging comments

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazelrigg, L. Reading Goffman's framing as provocation of a discipline. Hum Stud 15, 239–264 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182108

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182108

Keywords

Navigation