Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ultrasound transmission velocity with computed metacarpal radiogrammetry and dual-photon absorptiometry

  • Musculoskeletal Radiology
  • Original article
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the validity of a quantitative US technique for measuring the bone density of the proximal phalanges of the nondominant hand compared with computed metacarpal radiogrammetry and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the lumbar spine. Mean US bone velocity (UBV) correlated with mean metacarpal cortical index (MCI), with mean metacarpal bone density (MBD) and with bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, whereas it was correlated negatively with age and menopause duration. The average UBV was significantly higher in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women, and higher in normal lumbar DPA patients than in reduced lumbar DPA patients. We conclude that the US evaluation of the nondominant hand proximal phalanges may be a new alternative way for measuring bone mass in screening of osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Consensus Development Conference (1991) Prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int: 114–117

  2. Hagiwara S, Yang S-O, Gluer CC et al. (1994) Noninvasive bone mineral density measurement in the evaluation of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 20 (3):651–669

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grammp S, Jergas M, Gluer CC et al. (1993) Radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis:current methods and perspectives. Endocr Radiol 31 (5): 1133–1144

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jergas M, Uffmann M, Muller P et al. (1993) Ultraschallgeschwinndigkeitmessung zur diagnose der postmenopausalen osteoporose. Fortschr Roengenstr 158 (3): 207–213

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fredfelt KE (1986) Sound velocity in the middle phalanges of the human hand. Acta Radiol Diag 27 (1):95–96

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lusenti T, Cadossi R, Franco V et al. (1994) Valutazione del tessuto osseo con ultrasuoni (US) sulla falange prossimale delle mani nelle pazienti con sospetta osteoporosi di tipo I. Minerva Ginecol 46: 423–428

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rico H, Aguado F, Revilla M et al. (1994) Ultrasound bone velocity and metacarpal radiogrammetry in hemodialyzed patients. Miner Electrolyte Metab 20: 103–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rico H, Aguado F, Revilla M et al. (1994) Comparacion de la velocidad de transmision del ultrasonido con la radiogrametria metacarpiana computada, como medias de masa osea. Rev Esp Enferm Metab Oseas 3 (2): 48–51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Floriani L, Debevoise N, Hyatt G (1967) Mechanical properties of healing by the use of ultrasound. Surg Forum 18: 468

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abendschein W, Hyatt GW (1970) Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone. Clin Orthop Rel Res 69: 294

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman JJ, Einhorn TA (1993) Perspectives ultrasound assessment of bone. J Bone Min Res 8 (5): 517–525

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waud CE, Lew R, Baran DT (1992) The relationship between ultrasound and densitometric measurements of bone mass at the calcaneus in women. Calcif Tissue Int 51: 415–418

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alenfeld FE, Wuster C, Beck C, Ziegler R (1995) Validity of ultrasound measurements of bone mineral density on the phalanges of the hand. Perth International Bone Meeting, Melbourne 14–19 February 1995, Book of Abstracts, S61, p. 54

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: A. Sili Scavalli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scavalli, A.S., Marini, M., Spadaro, A. et al. Comparison of ultrasound transmission velocity with computed metacarpal radiogrammetry and dual-photon absorptiometry. Eur. Radiol. 6, 192–195 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181144

Key words

Navigation