Skip to main content
Log in

The private interest in public redistribution: A public choice view of the geographic distribution of federal funds

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barone, M., and Usifusa, G. (1982). Almanac of American politics — 1981. Washington, D.C.: Barone & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P., and Cox, D.R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 26 (Series B).

  • Congressional directory — 1981. (1981). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Crain, W.M., and Tollison, R.D. (1977). The influence of public policy on representation. Journal of Legal Studies 6 (June): 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A. (1974). Pork barrel politics: Rivers and harbors legislation, 1947–68. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M.J. (1976). In Congress, an effort to reverse the tide. Empire State Report, Vol. 2. New York: New York State Legislative Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G., and Zardkoohi, A. (1981). The determinants of federal grants. Southern Economic Journal 48: 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W. (1976). Federal funds pour into sunbelt states. New York Times (9 February).

  • Labovitz, I.M. (1980). Details of the distributions. In Regional growth: Flows of federal funds, 1952–76, 39–54. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E.E. (1983). Let's take the con out of econometrics. American Economics Review 73 (March): 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E.E. (1985). Sensitivity analysis would help. American Economic Review 75 (June): 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E.E., and Tollison, R.D. (1980). Wealth transfers in a representative democracy. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, W.L. (1969). Congressional committees. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D.P. (1978). The politics and economics of regional growth. The Public Interest 51 (Spring).

  • Pack, J.R. (1982). The states' scramble for federal funds: Who wins, who loses? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1(2) (Winter): 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. (1968) Some organizational influences in urban renewal decisions. American Economic Review 58 (May): 306–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, B.A. (1980). Congressional losers in the U.S. federal spending process. Legislative Studies Quarterly 3 (August): 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritt, L.G. (1976). Committee position, seniority, and the distribution of government expenditures. Public Policy 24 (Fall).

  • Rundquist, B.S., and Ferejohn, J.A. (1975). Observations on a distributive theory of policymaking: Two American expenditure programs compared. In C. Liske, W. Loehr and J. McCamont (Eds.), Comparative public policy: Issues, theories and methods. New York: Wiley, Halsted Press Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1972). Economic competition and political competition. Public Choice 13 (Fall): 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1976). The sizes of legislatures. Journal of Legal Studies 5: 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laband, D.N. The private interest in public redistribution: A public choice view of the geographic distribution of federal funds. Public Choice 49, 117–125 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181034

Keywords

Navigation