Skip to main content
Log in

Vascular autotransplantation for urethral replacement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present two experimental models consisting of two groups of 16 dogs each in which we performed venous and arterial autotransplants in the urethra using the same surgical technique and the same sutures. As a substitute for the urethra, 4 to 5 cm of either superficial femoral artery or vein were used. Clinical, radiologic, and histologic evaluations were performed 15, 30, 90, and 180 days following the autotransplants. Total re-epithelialization of the venous graft, good micturitional flow, and suitable distension of the neourethra during micturition were observed. the arterial graft also underwent total re-epithelialization, but was very rigid, so that the caliber of the neourethra decreased over a period of several months, causing a number of complications after 6 months of follow-up. We compare this transplant technique with the generally used techniques for hypospadias repair such as the use of skin, bladder mucosa, tunica vaginalis, and ureter. The results were statistically analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Browne D (1949) An operation for hypospadias. Proc Roy Soc Med 42: 466–468

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byars LT (1955) A technique for consistently satisfactory repair of hypospadias. Surg Gynecol Obstet 100: 184–187

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devine JC, Horton CE (1977) Hypospadias repair. J Urol 118: 188–194

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duckett JW Jr (1980) Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 7: 423–431

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldenberg SL (1983) Patch autografts in the treatment of urethral stricture. Can J Surg 26: 418–422

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hillman BJ (1981) Evaluation of post-surgical urethra and urethral strictures by meatal compression-voiding urethrography. Urology 17: 95–98

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgson NB (1970) One-stage hypospadias repair. J Urol 104: 281–283

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB (1985) Clinical pediatric urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 751–792

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall VF (1957) Free grafts of mucosa from the urinary bladder for the construction of a urethra in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 20: 423–427

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mathieu, P (1932) Traitment en un temps de l 'hypospadias balanique et iuxtabalanique. J Chir 39: 481–485

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roemer, KR (1984) Tunica vaginalis patch graft urethroplasty. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159: 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schneeden V (1909) New method of operation male hypospadias. Free transplantation of ureter to form urethra. Arch Klin Chir 90: 748–751

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tuffier T (1910) Venous graft for autoplastic repair of perineal urethra. Bull Soc Chir 36: 589–593

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong-Chu L, Yu-Hen Z, Ya-Xiong S, Yu-Feng C (1981) One-stage urethroplasty for hypospadias using a tube constructed with bladder mucosa. A new procedure. Urol Clin North Am 8: 463–470

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This experimental study was made with a scholarship of investigation donated by the Canary island Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomez Culebras, M.A., Hernandez-Siverio Gonzalez, N., Mendez Medina, R.L. et al. Vascular autotransplantation for urethral replacement. Pediatr Surg Int 8, 496–499 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180353

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180353

Key words

Navigation