Abstract
Among the options suggested in phylogenetic systematics to solve the species problem is the Hennigian or internodal species concept. This concept interprets species as parts of the genealogical network of individual organisms between two successive permanent splits or between a permanent split and an extinction event. Though this option is at present not favoured by phylogeneticists, we believe that, to solve the species problem, there is no alternative to finding a satisfactory partition of the genealogical network. In previous work a formal definition has been developed of Hennigian or internodal species (called internodons here), based on a logical relation between individual organisms. In this paper, we prove that this definition indeed partitions genealogical networks exhaustively into mutually exclusive entities, by showing that the defining relation is an equivalence relation. Although internodons should not themselves be seen as species, they are essential building-blocks for any satisfying species concept.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Cracraft, J.: Species concept and species analysis. Curr. Ornithol. 1, 159–187 (1983)
Ghiselin, M. T.: A radical solution to the species problem. Syst. Zool. 23, 536–544 (1974)
Gregg, J. R.: The Language of Taxonomy: An Application of Symbolic Logic to the Study of Classificatory Systems. New York: Columbia University Press (1954)
Hennig, W.: Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press (1966)
Hull, D. L.: Are species really individuals? Syst. Zool. 25, 174–191 (1976)
Kornet, D. J.: Permanent splits as speciation events: a formal reconstruction of the internodal species concept. J. Theor. Biol. 164, 407–435 (1993)
Kornet, D. J. and McAllister, J. W.: The composite species concept (subm.)
Mayr, E.: Speciation phenomena in birds. Amer. Nat. 74, 249–278 (1940)
Mayr, E.: Origin and history of some terms in systematic and evolutionary biology. Syst. Zool. 27, 83–88 (1978)
Mayr, E.: The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (1982)
Nelson, G. and Platnick, N. I.: Systematics and Biogeography. Columbia University Press, New York (1981)
Nixon, K. C. and Wheeler, Q. D.: An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6, 211–223 (1990)
Ridley, M.: The cladistic solution to the species problem. Biol. Phil. 4, 1–16 (1989)
Simpson, G. G.: Principles of Animal Taxonomy. (Reprinted, 1990.) New York: Columbia University Press (1961)
Wiley, E. O.: Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: John Wiley (1981)
Williams, M. B.: Deducing the consequences of evolution: a mathematical model. J. Theor. Biol. 29, 343–385 (1970)
Woodger, J. H.: From biology to mathematics. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 3, 1–21 (1952)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kornet, D.J., Metz, J.A.J. & Schellinx, H.A.J.M. Internodons as equivalence classes in genealogical networks: building-blocks for a rigorous species concept. J. Math. Biol. 34, 110–122 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180139
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180139