Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fuzzy measurement of income inequality: a class of fuzzy inequality measures

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The typical practice of income inequality evaluation is by using inequality indices. Yet there is no “best” measure of inequality as we know it, and hence, any conclusion based on an inequality index must be subject to some doubts. Some authors even argued that the concept of inequality, by its very nature, is vague, and thus, cannot be measured like an exact concept. Motivated by these considerations, this paper studies axiomatic fuzzifications of inequality measures. Consequently, a systematic method of viewing the conclusions of inequality comparisons in terms of truth value statements is developed. Furthermore, it is shown that this method (or in fact, any other fuzzy inequality measure) can be used to construct confidence intervals for the crisp conclusions of inequality indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aczel J (1993) Personal communication

  2. Atkinson AB (1975) The Economics of inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee A (1993) Rational choice under fuzzy preferences. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 53: 295–299

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baron K (1993) Personal communication

  5. Basu K (1987) Axioms for a fuzzy measure of inequality. Math Soc Sci 14: 275–288

    Google Scholar 

  6. Basu K, Deb R, Pattanaik P (1992) Soft sets: an ordinal formulation of vagueness with some applications to the theory of choice. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 45: 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bezdek JCC, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1: 255–258

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bezdek JCC, Harris JD (1978) Fuzzy partitions and relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1: 111–127

    Google Scholar 

  9. Billot A (1992) Economic theory of fuzzy equilibria. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braun D (1988) Multiple measurements of US income inequality. Rev Econ Stat 70: 398–405

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dasgupta P, Sen A, Starrett D (1973) Notes on the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 6: 180–187

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dimitru V, Luban F (1982) Membership functions, some mathematical programming models and production scheduling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 8: 19–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dimitru V, Luban F (1986) On some optimization problems under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18: 257–272

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dombi J (1990) Membership functions as an evaluation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 35: 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois D, Prade H (1985) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fields G, Fei JCH (1978) On inequality comparisons. Econometrica 46: 303–316

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hannan EL (1981) Linear programming with multiple fuzzy goals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6: 235–248

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hersh HM, Caramazza AA (1976) A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural languages. J Exp Psychol 105: 254–276

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hersh HM, Caramazza AA, Brownell (1979) Effects of context on fuzzy membership functions. In: Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, (eds) Gupta MM et al. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 565–579

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gougen JA (1968) The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese 19: 325–373

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufmann A (1975) Introduction to the theory of fuzzy subsets. Vol 1, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kochen M, Badre AN (1974) On the precision of adjectives with denote fuzzy sets. J Cybernet 4: 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall AW, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ok E (1993) Fuzzy income inequality measurement I. CAE working paper No. 93-05

  25. Ok E (1994) A note on the approximation of fuzzy preferences by exact relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems (forthcoming)

  26. Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1: 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ovchinnikov S (1981) Structure of fuzzy binary relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6: 169–195

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ovchinnikov S (1986) On the transitivity property. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20: 241–243

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ovchinnikov S (1991) Similarity relations, fuzzy partitions and fuzzy orderings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40: 107–126

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sen A (1973) On economic inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smithson M (1986) Fuzzy set analysis for behavioral and social sciences. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12: 117–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zadeh LA (1971) Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Inf Sci 3: 177–206

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmermann HJ (1985) Fuzzy set theory. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Cornell University, 435 Uris Hall, 14853-7601, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Efe A. Ok

Authors
  1. Efe A. Ok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I wish to thank Kaushik Basu, Larry Blume, Gary Fields, Tapan Mitra, Maurice Salles, Anthony Shorrocks, Sinan Unur, the participants of the 1993 Midwest Mathematical Economics Conference held in University of Wisconsin at Madison and those of the 2nd International Meeting of the Society for Social Choice and Welfare held at University of Rochester, and two anonymous referees for insightful comments and suggestions. Janos Aczel and Karol Baron kindly provided some help about a mathematical problem I faced, I am grateful to them. Needless to mention, however, the usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ok, E.A. Fuzzy measurement of income inequality: a class of fuzzy inequality measures. Soc Choice Welfare 12, 111–136 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179828

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179828

Keywords

Search

Navigation