Summary
Following a short presentation of the striking deficiencies of plan instructions and ‘financial regulation’ — the formal means of control of today's socialist centrally planned economies — we state that in actual fact these are not the basic means of control in these systems.
The basic means of control is mobilization. Historically, this method originated from the declared unity of society. People — first of all economic managers — have to identify themselves with the objectives declared by the authorities. Moreover, the deficiencies of the formal means of control perpetuate the basic task assigned to mobilization.
Campaigns are a specific kind of mobilization, meant for the implementation of new national economic objectives or tasks that have become newly important. Although mobilization facilitates the functioning of the economic system, we also have to underline two kinds of its negative consequences. First, mobilization oversimplifies the economic problems, ‘tasks’ which in reality are tremedously complex. To be sure, some tasks can be implemented with its help, but certainly at high costs. Second, the never-ending repetition of the prevailing (campaign) slogans and the fact that they cannot be really contradicted weakens the capacity of central planners to forecast the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bajt, A., ‘Značenje apela’ (The meaning of calls), Ekonomska Politika, (23 March 1981).
Bauer T., ‘Investment cycles in planned economies’. Acta Oeconomica, (1978) Vol. 21, no. 3.
BendixR., ‘The political and cultural setting of economic rationality in Western and Eastern Europe’, in GrossmanG. (ed.), Value and Plan, Berkeley, University of California Press (1960).
BerlinerJ. S., Factory and Manager in the USSR, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press (1957).
BerlinerJ. S., ‘Technological progress and the evolution of Soviety pricing’, in RosefieldeS. (ed.), Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1981).
Ekonomske i ostale slobode (Economic and other liberties), Ekonomska Politika, (26 April 1982).
GarvyG., Money, Banking and Credit in Eastern Europe, New York, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (1966).
GeröE., A vas, az acél és a gépek országáért (For a country of iron, steel and machines), Budapest, Szikra (1952).
GrossmanG., ‘The party as manager and entrepreneur’, in GuroffG. and CarstensenF. V. (eds.), Entrepreneurship in Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union, Princeton, Princeton University Press (1983).
KornaiJ., Over-centralization in Economic Administration, London, Oxford University Press (1959).
KornaiJ., The Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam, North-Holland (1980).
SchweitzerI., A vállalatnagyság (The size of the firm), Budapest, Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó (1982).
Soós K. A., ‘Causes of investment fluctuations in the Hungarian econony’, Eastern European Economics, Vol. XIV, no. 2. (1976).
Soós K. A., ‘Planification impérative, régulation financiére, “grandes orientations” et camagnes’, Revue d'Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest, (1985) Vol. XVI, no. 2.
WilesP. J. D., The Political Economy of Communism, Oxford, Basil Blackwell (1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper — the basic idea of which had already been present in Soós (1985) — was written while the author was visiting the European University Institute in April 1986, within the Research Project on “East-West Trade and Financial Relations”, directed by Professor D. M. Nuti. The paper was presented to the seminar of the working group on Comparative Economic Systems on 17 April 1986. The author wishes to thank Professor Paul Marer for his editorial help in preparing this final version.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soós, K.A. Informal pressures, mobilization, and campaigns in the management of centrally planned economies. Econ Plann 21, 39–48 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178802
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178802