Skip to main content
Log in

Alliances in winter flocks of willow tits; effects of rank on survival and reproductive success in male-female associations

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The value of being dominant in winter flocks of willow tits may not only be a matter of personal survival for males, although their survival probability was highest among flock members. Winter flocks of willow tits contain male-female subunits, and the dominant pair may be viewed as an alliance based on mutual benefits. Dominant males provide their mates with protection in winter, and females return the help in reproductive success. Survival was directly related to rank only within sexes. Mates of dominant males survived significantly better than low-ranked males even though these females were subordinate to these males in direct interactions. Mates of dominant males were relatively spared from costs of low rank as they were subject to aggression less often than expected. Presumably dominant males prevented such attacks, as they excluded other flock members from high tree sections where their mates fed. Males should gain from improving the survival probability of their mates since it was not always possible to replace lost mates in spring populations having a male-biased sex ratio. Dominance in avian winter flocks may thus have more indirect effects than merely to improve the personal survival probability through resource priority. The benefits of being a dominant suggest that subordinate willow tits join groups because there is no space available for them to take up a territory as dominants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 221:1390–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JV (1968) Distribution-free statistical test. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley DW (1985) The effect of visibility bias on time budget estimates of niche breadth and overlap. Auk 102:493–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1963) Aggressiveness, dominance, and social organization in the Steller Jay. Condor 65:460–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1979) Time budgeting and group size: a test of theory. Ecology 60:618–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederholm G, Ekman J (1976) A removal experiment on crested tit Parus cristatus and willow tit P. montanus in the breeding season. Ornis Scand 7:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon KL (1963) Some aspects of social organization in the Carolina chickadee. Proc XIII Int Ornithol Congr:240–258

  • Dixon KL (1965) Dominance-subordination relationship in the Mountain chickadee. Condor 67:291–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar RIM (1988) Primate social systems. Studies in behavioural adaptations. Croom Helm, Bekenhem, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1979) Coherence, composition and territories of winter social groups of the Willow Tit Parus montanus and the Crested Tit P. cristatus. Ornis Scand 10:56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1984) Density-dependent seasonal mortality and population fluctuations of the temperate-zone Willow Tit (Parus montanus). J Anim Ecol 53:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1986) Tree use and predator vulnerability of wintering passerines. Ornis Scand 17:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1987) Exposure and time use in willow tit flocks: the cost of subordination. Anim Behav 35:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1989a) Group size in dominance-structured populations. Ornis Scand 20:86–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1989b) Subordination costs and group territoriality in wintering willow tits. Proc XIX Int Ornithol Congr:2373–2381

  • Ekman J, Askenmo C (1984) Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups. Anim Behav 32:508–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Cederholm G, Askenmo C (1981) Spacing and survival in winter groups of Willow Tits Parus montanus and Crested Tit P. cristatus — a removal study. J Anim Ecol 50:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell S (1969) Dominance behaviour and winter habitat distribution in juncos (Junco hyemalis). Bird-banding 40:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Glase J (1973) Ecology of social organization in the black-capped chickadee. Living Bird 12:235–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn S (1982) Variation in body measurements of the Willow Tit Parus montanus, together with a method for sexing live birds and data on the degree of shrinkage in size after skinning. Fauna Norw Ser C 5:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1987a) Social rank in winter flocks of Willow Tits Parus montanus. Fauna Norw Ser C 129:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1987b) It is expensive to be dominant. Auk 104:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1988a) Rank-related resource access in winter flocks of Willow Tits Parus montanus. Ornis Scand 19:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1988b) Social rank and antipredator behaviour of Willow Tits Parus montanus in winter flocks. Ibis 130:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1989) Subordination in mixed-age bird flocks — a removal study. Ibis 131:128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson C, Ekman J, Brömssen A von (1981) Winter mortality and food supply in tits Parus spp. Oikos 37:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikkawa J (1968) Social hierarchy in winter flocks of the Greybreasted Silvereye Zosterops lateralis (Latham). Jpn J Ecol 18:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula K, Orell M (1988) Social rank and winter survival in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Fenn 65:114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen M, Lehikoinen E (1976) Age determination of Willow and Crested Tit Parus montanus and P. cristatus. Ornis Fenn 53:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman EL (1959) Testing statistical hypotheses. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1986) Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions: determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology 67:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Pusey A (1982) Cooperation and competition within coalitions of male lions; kin selection or game theory? Nature 296:740–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Järvi T, Bakken M, Bech C, Reinertsen RE (1986) The relationship between social status and resting metabolic rate in great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Anim Behav 34:838–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabine WS (1959) The winter society of the Oregon junco: intolerance, dominance and the pecking order. Condor 61:110–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1984) Flock switching in chickadees; why be a winter floater? Am Nat 123:81–98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekman, J. Alliances in winter flocks of willow tits; effects of rank on survival and reproductive success in male-female associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26, 239–245 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178317

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178317

Keywords

Navigation