Abstract
Key-press responding of mice was maintained under a fixed-ratio (FR) 30-response schedule of food presentation. Successive 3-min periods during which the experimental chamber was illuminated and the schedule was in effect were preceded by 10-min time-out (TO) periods during which all lights were out and responses had no scheduled consequences. Intraperitoneal (IP) injections of saline or of cumulative doses of drugs were given at the start of each TO period. Successive saline injections had little or no effect on response rates, whereas the μ-opioid agonists morphine (0.1–10.0 mg/kg) and levorphanol (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), the κ-opioid agonist ethylketazocine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg), the mixed μ-/δ-opioid agonist metkephamid (0.1–10.0 mg/kg), and the nonopioid dissociative anesthetic ketamine (1.0–100.0 mg/kg) generally produced dose-related decreases in response rates. Following chronic administration of morphine (100.0 mg/kg/6 h), tolerance developed to the effects of morphine on rates of responding. In addition, a comparable degree of cross-tolerance developed to the effects of levorphanol and metkephamid. On the other hand, there was no evidence of cross-tolerance to the effects of ethylketazocine or ketamine. These results are consistent with the evidence suggesting that different opioid agonists exert their behavioral effects through distinct classes of opioid receptors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burkhardt C, Fredrickson RCA, Pasternak GW (1982) Metkephamid (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-N(Me)-NH2), a potent opioid peptide: Receptor binding and analgesic properties. Peptides 3:869–871
Davis ME, Akera T, Brody TM (1979) Reduction of opiate binding to brainstem slices associated with the development of tolerance to morphine in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 211:112–119
Ferster CB, Skinner BF (1957) Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Finney DJ (1964) Statistical methods in biological assay, 2nd ed. Hafner, New York
Frederickson RCA, Smithwick EL, Shuman R, Bemis KG (1981) Metkephamid, a systemically active analog of methionine enkephalin with potent opioid δ-receptor activity. Science 211:603–605
Hynes MD, Fredrickson RCA (1982) Cross-tolerance studies distinguish morphine- and metkephamid-induced analgesia. Life Sci 31:1201–1204
Katz JL (1984) Effects of clonidine and some α-adrenergic antagonists alone and in combination on schedule-controlled behavior in pigeons and mice. Psychopharmacology 83:38–43
Katz JL, Solomon RE, Goodrich JE (1982) Morphine tolerance: cross tolerance and lack of cross-tolerance to different narcotic agonists. Pharmacologist 24:115 (abstract)
Law P-Y, Griffin MT, Loh HH (1984) Mechanisms of multiple cellular adaptation processes in clonal cell lines during chronic opiate treatment. In: Mechanisms of tolerance and dependence, NIDA Research Monograph No. 54, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, pp 119–135
Leander JD (1987) Cross-tolerance to metkephamid (LY127623) produced by morphine solution ingestion by mice. Alcohol Drug Res 7:321–325
Leander JD, Wood CR (1982) Metkephamid effects on operant behavior. Peptides 3:771–773
Locke KW, Holtzman SG (1986) Behavioral effects of opioid peptides selective for mu or delta receptors. II. Locomotor activity in non-dependent and morphine-dependent rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238:997–1003
McMillan DE, Wolf PS, Carchman RA (1970) Antagonism of the behavioral effects of morphine and methadone by narcotic antagonists in the pigeon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 175:443–458
Schulz R, Wuster M (1981) Are there subtypes (isoreceptors) of multiple opiate receptors in the mouse vas deferens? Eur J Pharmacol 76:61–66
Schulz R, Wuster M, Herz A (1981) Differentiation of opiate receptors in the brain by the selective development of tolerance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:75–79
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 135–171
Solomon RE, Herling S, Woods JH (1981) Ketamine-like discriminative characteristics of the stereoisomers of metazocine, cyclazocine and SKF-10,047 in rhesus monkeys. In: Advances in endogenous and exogenous opioids. Kodansha, Tokyo, pp 484–486
Solomon RE, Herling S, Domino EF, Woods JH (1982) Discriminative stimulus effects of N-substituted analogs of phencyclidine in rhesus monkeys. Neuropharmacology 21:1329–1336
Solomon RE, Wasserman EA, Gebhart GF (1987) Tolerance to antinociceptive effects of morphine without tolerance to its effects on schedule-controlled behavior. Psychopharmacology 92:327–333
Swain HH, Seevers MH (1974) Evaluation of new compounds for morphine-like physical dependence in the rhesus monkey. In: Proceedings of the Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence. NAS-NRC Washington, DC, Addendum
Tepper P, Woods JH (1978) Changes in locomotor activity and naloxone-induced jumping in mice produced by WIN 35,197–2 (ethylketazocine) and morphine. Psychopharmacology 58:125–129
Thompson T, Trombley J, Luke D, Lott D (1970) Effects of morphine on behavior maintained by four simple food-reinforcement schedules. Psychopharmacologia 17:182–192
Valentino RJ, Herling S, Woods JH (1983) Discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone in narcotic-naive and morphine-treated pigeons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 224:307–313
Woods JH, Carney J (1978) Narcotic tolerance and operant behavior. In: Krasnegor NA (ed) Behavioral tolerance: research and treatment implications. NIDA Research Monograph Series, vol 19, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 54–66
Woods JH, Smith CB, Medzihradsky F, Swain HH (1979) Preclinical testing of analgesic drugs. In: Beers RF Jr, Bassett EG (eds) Mechanisms of pain and analgesic compounds. Raven Press, New York, pp 429–445
Young AM (1986) Effects of acute morphine pretreatment on the rate-decreasing and antagonist activity of naloxone. Psychopharmacology 88:201–208
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solomon, R.E., Goodrich, J.E. & Katz, J.L. Opioid receptor subtype-specific cross-tolerance to the effects of morphine on schedule-controlled behavior in mice. Psychopharmacology 96, 218–222 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177563
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177563