Skip to main content
Log in

BendCad: a design system for concurrent multiple representations of parts

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concurrency in product design and manufacturing process planning is supported in a recently developed sheet metal design system that incorporates preliminary process design at the detail product design stage. This new ‘design with process features’ approach represents the evolving part form to the designer in multiple process domains and at multiple stages of a sequential process. Each set of part form representations defines the conceptualized process that transforms it from one to the other. At this modeling level, processes are reversible so that design activity can take place in any of the domains and be transferred to the others. We have fully implemented this concept in a sheet metal design/manufacturing system in which preliminary process design occurs concurrently with product design and the normal representational ambiguities of wireframe and flat panel models are eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreason, M. M., Kahler, S. and Lund, T. (1988) Design for Assembly, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, D. A. (1992) Intelligent manufacturing workstations, in Knowledge-Based Automation of Processes, ASME-WAM, Anaheim, CA, pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecker, J. N., Valeri, V. P. and Rife, D. F. (1984) A sheet metal FMS, in Autofact 6 Proceedings, Anaheim, CA, 1–4 October. CASA/SME, Dearborn, MI, pp. 24–13–24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K. M. (1987) An analysis of performance measurement systems in selected Just-in-Time operations, Ph.D Dissertation, University of Georgia.

  • Cutkosky, M. R., Brown, D. R. and Tenenbaum, J. M. (1989) Extending concurrent product and process design toward earlier design stages in Concurrent Product and Process Design, N.-H. Chao and S. C.-Y. Lu (eds), ASME-PED Vol. 36, pp. 65–72.

  • Dixon, J. R. (1988) Designing with features: building manufacturing knowledge into more intelligent CAD systems, in Proceedings of ASME Manufacturing International 88, Atlanta, GA, 17–20 April, pp. 51–57.

  • Finger, S. and Dixon, J. R. (1989) A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representation, analysis and design for the life cycle. Research in Engineering Design, 1, 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S., Fox, M., Prinz, F. and Rinderle, J. (1990) Concurrent design, EDRC Report #24–39–90, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadh, R. and Prinz, F. B. (1991) Shape feature abstraction in knowledge-based analysis of manufactured products, in Proceedings IEEE Conference on AI Application, Miami, FL, 24–28 February, pp. 198–204.

  • Hayes, C. C., Desa, S. and Wright, P. K. (1989) Using process planning knowledge to make design decisions concurrently, in Concurrent Product and Process Design, N.-H. Chao and S. -Y. Lu (eds), ASME-PED Vol. 36, pp. 87–92.

  • Henderson, M. R. and Anderson, D. C. (1984) Computer recognition and extraction of form features: a CAD/CAM link. Computers in Industry, 5, 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inui, M. and Kimura, F. (1991) Design of machining processes with dynamic manipulation of product models, in Artificial Intelligence in Design, D. T. Pham (ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 195–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilani, M. I. and Sturges, R. H. (1992) Detection and evaluation of orientation features for CAD part models. Journal of Engineering Design, 2 (3), 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimpel, J. F. and Richards, L. G. (1991) A feature-based group technology coding system for sheet metal parts. Journal of Engineering Design, 2 (3), 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliszewski, R. S. (1983) Sheet metal FMS nesting and punching optimization system, Westinghouse Productivity and Quality Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingo, S. (1985) A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G. (ed.) (1988) Report on the Workshop on Features in Design and Manufacturing, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 26–28 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturges, R. H., Dorman, J. G. and Brecker, J. N. (1986) Design for Producibility, Course Notes, Westinghouse Productivity and Quality Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar, S., Sapossnek, M., Hou, L., Woodbury, R., Sedas, S. and Saigal, S. (1990) Autonomous Critics, EDRC Report 18–13–90, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. K. and Bourne, D. A. (1988) Manufacturing Intelligence, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, CH., Sturges, R.H. BendCad: a design system for concurrent multiple representations of parts. J Intell Manuf 7, 133–144 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177069

Keywords

Navigation