Skip to main content
Log in

Plan-based manufacturability analysis and generation of shape-changing redesign suggestions

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we describe Design Advisor, a plan-based tool for generating cost-reducing design suggestions. In general, there are many tools that will provide design evaluations, but few that will provide specific design suggestions as to how to improve a design. Design Advisor takes a feature-based artifact description and provides specific suggestions on how to change the shape of those features so as to reduce the overall manufacturing cost of the artifact. It does so by generating a manufacturing plan and analyzing what changes in the design will result in fewer manufacturing steps. In doing so, Design Advisor creates a link between the artifact design and complex manufacturing cost factors. An additional difficulty with suggestion generators is that they may generate many unreasonable design suggestions. By unreasonbale, we mean that they may produce design suggestions that reduce cost, but do so by eliminating or modifying the design in ways that compromise its function. Design Advisor addresses this problem using both functional and cost information to prune design suggestions. Without this pruning, an overwhelming number of design suggestions could be generated. This method can aid designers by providing them with manufacturability information early in the design cycle. This enables them to rapidly pinpoint the parts of the design that contribute most to cost. The result is shorter design cycle times and higher-quality, lower-cost product designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boothroyd, G. and Dewhurst, P. (1983) Design for Assembly - A Designer's Handbook, Technical Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts.

  • Boothroyd, G. and Dewhurst, P. (1993) Machining: Material Selection and Process Costing, Release 1.3, Technical Report, Boothroyd and Dewhurst, Inc., Wakefield, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. C. and Anderson, D. C. (1992) Quick turnaround cell - an integration of feature based design and process planning, in First Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL, May.

  • Cutkosky, M. R. and Tenenbaum, J. M. (1987) CAD/CAM Integration Through Concurrent Process and Product Design, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, D., Gupta, S. K. and Nau, D. A. (1994) Reducing cost set-up by automated generation of redesign suggestions, in ASME Computers in Engineering Conference, Minneapolis, MN, September.

  • Ferreira, P. M., Lu, S. C.-Y. and Zhu, X. (1990) A conceptual model for process planning, Technical Report to CAM-I, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, C. C. (1990) Machining planning: a model of an expert level planning process, PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, C. C. and Sun, H. C. (1994) Plan-based generation of design suggestions, in Automated Design Critiquing Session of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, November.

  • Hayes, C. C., Desa, S. and Wright, P. K. (1989) Using process planning knowledge to make design suggestions concurrently, in Concurrent Product and Process Design. Session of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, pp. 87–92, Anaheim, CA, December.

  • Hetem, V (1994) Concurrent cost estimating, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Unviersity of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantyla, M., Opas, J. and Puhakka, J. (1989) Generative process planning of prismatic parts feature relaxation, in Advances in Design Automation, Vol. 19–1, pp. 49–60, Montreal, September.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nau, D. S. (1987) Hierarchical abstraction for process planning, in Knowledge Based Expert Systems in Engineering Planning and Design, Sriram, D. and Adey, R. A. (eds), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovanovic, P. (1989) Approximate cost estimating for machined components, Master's Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Department of Mechcanical and Industrial Engineering.

  • Schmitz, J. M. and Desa, S. (1994) Development and implementation of a design for producibility method for precision planar stamped products. Journal of Mechanical Design, 116, 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierda, L. (1988) Product cost-estimation by the designer. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 13 (3), 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. and Lu, S. C.-Y. (1991) An expert system approach for economic evaluation of machining operation planning, Technical Report TR 91–77, Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayes, C.C. Plan-based manufacturability analysis and generation of shape-changing redesign suggestions. J Intell Manuf 7, 121–132 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177068

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177068

Keywords

Navigation