Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of electroneuronography with facial nerve latency testing for prognostic accuracy in patients with Bell's palsy

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of electroneuronography (ENOG), also called evoked electromyography (EEMG), and facial nerve latency testing (FNLT) to assess the prognosis of facial nerve palsy, using the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system as criterion. From 1988 to 1994 these tests were employed at the ORL Clinic of the University of Ioannina in 250 patients with idiopathic facial nerve palsy. The ENOG test results indicated that when the amplitude of the compound muscle action potentials ranged from 51% to 95% of the normal value, 97% of the patients achieved complete functional recovery (grade 1) within at least 2 months. When the muscle action potential decreased to a value below 51% of normal values, prognosis for recovery was considerably worse. FNLT test results indicated that as the latency time extended, the recovery grade of the facial nerve worsened. When latency time was within the normal range (group A patients), about 92% of patients had complete functional recovery. In contrast all patients having either a very extended latency time or unable to be monitored (groups C and D) demonstrated incomplete functional recoveries that ranged from grade 11 to grade VI. Comparing each test with the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system, we ascertained that the percent accuracy for ENOG was 97.6%, and that for FNLT was 94.4%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adour K K, Kedar K, Muray I (1980) Maximal nerve excitability testing versus neuromyography: prognostic value in patients with facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 90:1540–1547

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell E D R, Hickey RD, Nixon KH (1962) Value of nerve-excitability measurements in Prognosis of facial palsy. BMJ 2:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danielides V, Skevas A, Kastanioudakis I, Anastasopoulos D (1993) Vergleich der prognostischen Aussagefähigkeit zwischen Nerve Excitability Test (NET) and Maximum Stimulation Test bei der Beurteilung der Bellschen Lähmung. HNO 41:417–420

    Google Scholar 

  4. Devriese PP, Schumacher T, Scheide A, De Jongh RH, Houtkooper JM (1990) Incidence, prognosis and recovery of Bell's palsy. A survey of about 1000 patients (1974–1983). Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 15:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esslen E (1973) Electrodiagnosis of facial palsy. In Miehlke A (ed) Surgery of the facial nerve. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp 49–51

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fish U (1977) Total facial nerve decompression and electroneurography. In Silverstein H, Norrell H (eds) Neurological surgery of the ear. Aesculapius, Birmingham, Ala, pp 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fish U (1981) Surgery for Bell's palsy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 107:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilliat RW, Taylor JC (1959) Electrical changes following section of the facial nerve. Proc R Soc Med 52:1080–1083

    Google Scholar 

  9. House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading systems. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:146–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Joachims HZ, Bialik V, Eliachar I (1980) Early diagnosis in Bell's palsy. Laryngoscope 90:1705–1708

    Google Scholar 

  11. Langworth EP, Taverner D (1963) The prognosis in facial palsy. Brain 86:465–480

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laumans EPJ (1965) Nerve excitability tests in facial paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol 81:478–488

    Google Scholar 

  13. May M, Harvey JE, Marovitz WF (1971) The prognostic accuracy of maximum stimulation test compared with that of the nerve excitability test in Bell's palsy. Laryngoscope 81:931–938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. May M, Blumenthal F, Klein SR (1983) Acute Bell's palsy: prognostic value of evoked electromyography maximal stimulation and other electrical tests. Am J Otol 5:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers RL (1978) Nerve conduction time in Bell's palsy. Laryngoscope 88:314–316

    Google Scholar 

  16. Skevas A, Danielides V, Assimakopoulos D (1990) The role of the facial nerve latency test in the prognosis of Bell's palsy. Laryngoscope 100:1083–1085

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sunderland S(1978) Nerve and nerve injuries, 2nd edn. ChurchillLivingstone, London, pp 88–89, 96–97, 133

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taverner D (1965). Electrodiagnosis in facial palsy. Arch Otolaryngol 81:470–477

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danielides, V., Skevas, A. & Van Cauwenberge, P. A comparison of electroneuronography with facial nerve latency testing for prognostic accuracy in patients with Bell's palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 253, 35–38 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176700

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176700

Key words

Navigation